KTM 690 Duke 2018 vs. MZ 1000 SF 2008

KTM 690 Duke 2018

KTM 690 Duke 2018

MZ 1000 SF 2008

MZ 1000 SF 2008

Loading...

Overview - KTM 690 Duke 2018 vs MZ 1000 SF 2008

KTM 690 Duke 2018

KTM 690 Duke 2018

MZ 1000 SF 2008

MZ 1000 SF 2008

Technical Specifications KTM 690 Duke 2018 compared to MZ 1000 SF 2008

KTM 690 Duke 2018
MZ 1000 SF 2008

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power73 HPEngine power112 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement690 ccmDisplacement998 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,466 mmWheelbase1,445 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height825 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 690 Duke 2018

KTM 690 Duke 2018

When you consider where the KTM Duke range once began, the 690 Duke represents an incredible leap forward. The engine is extremely refined yet incredibly powerful for a road-legal single-cylinder. Despite all the technology on board, it’s still a very light bike and could almost be described as a toy (in the best sense of the word). Only its riding position divides opinion, as the Duke 4, launched in 2012, evolved from the earlier Supermotos into an almost tame naked bike with a front-wheel-oriented riding position. The advantage is that everyday riding and long tours should pose no problem on the current Duke.

powerful engine

suitable for everyday use

plenty of technical aids

manoeuvrable

smooth-running

For some, it’s not a ‘proper’ single-cylinder Duke

MZ 1000 SF 2008

MZ 1000 SF 2008

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Average Market Price KTM 690 Duke vs MZ 1000 SF

Price KTM 690 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Price MZ 1000 SF

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons