BMW C 400 GT 2022 vs. Yamaha TMAX 560 2021

BMW C 400 GT 2022

Yamaha TMAX 560 2021
Loading...
Technical Specifications BMW C 400 GT 2022 compared to Yamaha TMAX 560 2021
BMW C 400 GT 2022
Yamaha TMAX 560 2021
Engine and Drive Train
| Bore | Bore | 80 mm | Bore | 70 mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stroke | Stroke | 69.6 mm | Stroke | 73 mm |
| Engine power | Engine power | 34 HP | Engine power | 47.6 HP |
| Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,500 rpm |
| Torque | Torque | 35 Nm | Torque | 55.7 Nm |
| Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 5,750 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 5,250 rpm |
| Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 11.5 | Compression Ratio | 10.9 |
| Fuel system | Fuel system | Injection | Fuel system | Injection |
| Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Electric |
| Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Centrifugal force | Clutch Type | Centrifugal force |
| Transmission Type | Transmission Type | Variomatic | Transmission Type | Automatic |
| Cylinders | Cylinders | 1 | Cylinders | 2 |
| Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
| Valves per cylinder | Valves per cylinder | 4 | Valves per cylinder | 4 |
| Valves | Valves | OHC | Valves | DOHC |
| Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
| Displacement | Displacement | 350 ccm | Displacement | 562 ccm |
Suspension Front
| Front suspension | Front suspension | Telescopic fork | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travel | Travel | 110 mm | Travel | 120 mm |
Suspension Rear
| Suspension | Suspension | Swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shock absorber | Shock absorber | Dual Shock | Shock absorber | Monoshock |
| Travel | Travel | 112 mm | Travel | 117 mm |
Chassis
| Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Aluminium |
|---|
Brakes Front
| Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter | Diameter | 265 mm | Diameter | 267 mm |
Brakes Rear
| Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter | Diameter | 265 mm | Diameter | 282 mm |
Assistance Systems
| Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS, Ride by Wire, Traction control | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS |
|---|
Dimensions and Weights
| Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
| Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 15 inch | Front tyre diameter | 15 inch |
| Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 150 mm | Rear tyre width | 160 mm |
| Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 70 % | Rear tyre height | 60 % |
| Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 14 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 15 inch |
| Length | Length | 2,210 mm | Length | 2,200 mm |
| Width | Width | 835 mm | Width | 765 mm |
| Height | Height | 1,437 mm | Height | 1,420 mm |
| Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,565 mm | Wheelbase | 1,575 mm |
| Seat Height | Seat Height | 775 mm | Seat Height | 800 mm |
| Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 214 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 218 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 12.8 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 15 l |
| License compliancy | License compliancy | A2 | License compliancy | A2 |
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW C 400 GT vs Yamaha TMAX 560
Price BMW C 400 GT
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Yamaha TMAX 560
Model year
Current average market prices
















