Kawasaki Z900 2017 vs. BMW F 800 R 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

BMW F 800 R 2017

BMW F 800 R 2017

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2017 vs BMW F 800 R 2017

The Kawasaki Z900 2017 and the BMW F 800 R 2017 are both naked bikes with similar engine types and fuel systems. However, there are several differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki Z900 is more powerful with 125.4 HP compared to the BMW F 800 R's 90 HP. The Z900 also has a higher torque of 98.6 Nm compared to the F 800 R's 86 Nm. This means that the Z900 will offer more acceleration and power on the road.

Both bikes have a liquid cooling system and a displacement of around 800cc, but the Z900 has four cylinders compared to the F 800 R's two cylinders. This means that the Z900 will have smoother power delivery and potentially better overall performance.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension at the rear. However, the BMW F 800 R has an electronically adjustable suspension, which allows for more customization and comfort.

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

The chassis of the Kawasaki Z900 is made of steel, while the BMW F 800 R has an aluminum frame. This may result in a slight difference in weight and handling characteristics, with the BMW potentially being lighter and more agile.

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with four pistons, but the BMW F 800 R has radial technology, which provides better braking performance and control.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same tire widths and diameters. However, the BMW F 800 R has a longer wheelbase of 1520 mm compared to the Z900's 1450 mm. The seat height of the F 800 R is also slightly lower, ranging from 790 to 820 mm, compared to the Z900's 795 mm.

BMW F 800 R 2017

BMW F 800 R 2017

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Z900 is praised for its ingenious naked bike chassis, superb looks, and responsive engine. It is also considered to offer a good balance of performance, price, and practicality.

On the other hand, the BMW F 800 R is praised for its strong brakes, upgraded equipment, low weight, accessible geometry, and characteristic sound.

As for weaknesses, the Kawasaki Z900 is noted to have a narrow knee angle for tall people, suggesting that a different seat may be needed. The BMW F 800 R is described as somewhat pragmatic and lacking in effervescence.

In conclusion, the Kawasaki Z900 2017 and the BMW F 800 R 2017 are both capable naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Z900 offers more power and performance, while the F 800 R provides upgraded equipment and a potentially lighter weight. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2017 compared to BMW F 800 R 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017
BMW F 800 R 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore82 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke75.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power90 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque86 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque5,800 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12.02
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement798 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsSuspension electronically adjustable

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,145 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth860 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,235 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,520 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height790,770,820 mm
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

An incredibly well-designed motorbike. A lot of test work and attention to detail went into it. It has exactly the right power, exactly the right chassis and exactly the right look. An all-round successful naked bike that will make you happy for a long time. If you like, you can ride it simply and faithfully, but if you want, you can also ride it really fast and it wheels like hell. Great!

Ingenious nakedbike chassis

superb looks

engine responds super fine, revs up willingly and has a perfectly dimensioned torque

optimum intersection of performance, price and practical use

Knee angle very narrow for tall people (order another seat!)

BMW F 800 R 2017

BMW F 800 R 2017

With a EURO4 engine, new riding modes, new instruments and new colours, the F 800 R starts the new season. It is recognisable at first glance only by the end cap on the stately stainless steel exhaust. It is one of those full-grown motorbikes that, despite its considerable sporting potential, was designed for the widest possible user group. Therefore, it is absolutely beginner-friendly (throttled), but can also inspire an experienced audience. Its character remains somewhat pragmatic, but the unmistakable, hollow sound of the inline two compensates for this.

strong brakes

upgraded equipment

low weight

accessible geometry

characteristic sound

somewhat pragmatic

effervescence is a little lacking

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs BMW F 800 R

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2017 and a BMW F 800 R 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z900 2017 is about 18% higher. Compared to BMW F 800 R 2017 there are more Kawasaki Z900 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 43 compared to 16. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z900 with 85 days compared to 105 days for a BMW F 800 R. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 20 reviews for the BMW F 800 R since model year 2009. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 8,900 views for the first review on BMW F 800 R published on 10/10/2008.

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 800 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH