Kawasaki ER-6n 2006 vs. BMW F 800 R 2010

Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

BMW F 800 R 2010

BMW F 800 R 2010

Loading...

Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6n 2006 compared to BMW F 800 R 2010

Kawasaki ER-6n 2006
BMW F 800 R 2010

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power72 HPEngine power87 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement798 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,405 mmWheelbase1,520 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height800 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight179 kgDry Weight177 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15.5 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l
Top SpeedTop Speed200 km/hTop Speed200 km/h
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Kawasaki ER-6n 2006

Kawasaki doesn't build toys. The ER-6N is getting more serious - and remains beginner-friendly.

Lightness

precision

rideability

modern, dynamic look

beginner-friendly

trustworthy ergonomics

ABS.

Sitting position with regard to the footrests uncomfortable from 1.80m

hardly suitable for wheelies

BMW F 800 R 2010

BMW F 800 R 2010

In the advertisements, the new BMW F 800 R sometimes comes across as a woman's motorbike. This does not do the bike an injustice, but the civilised engine, the low seat height and the smooth controls certainly suit petite ladies.

High-quality components

great engine

good equipment possible

cockpit

positive chassis

low consumption.

High price

first gear a little too long

optics.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6n vs BMW F 800 R

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 800 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH