BMW S 1000 R 2022 vs. Yamaha MT-09 SP 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2022

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2022

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2022 vs Yamaha MT-09 SP 2022

The BMW S 1000 R 2022 and the Yamaha MT-09 SP 2022 are both naked bikes that offer powerful performance and advanced rider assistance systems. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R takes the lead with 165 HP compared to the Yamaha MT-09 SP's 119 HP. This gives the BMW a significant advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed. The BMW also has a higher torque of 114 Nm compared to the Yamaha's 93 Nm, providing better low-end power and responsiveness.

Both bikes feature an inline engine type, fuel injection systems, and liquid cooling. They also have similar suspension setups with upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arms with monoshock absorbers at the rear. The suspension on both bikes is adjustable for compression, preload, and rebound, allowing riders to fine-tune their riding experience.

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

In terms of chassis, both bikes feature aluminum frames with a twin-tube design, providing a good balance of rigidity and weight savings. The braking systems on both bikes are also similar, with double disk brakes at the front. However, the BMW S 1000 R has larger diameter front disks at 320 mm compared to the Yamaha MT-09 SP's 298 mm, which may result in better braking performance.

Both bikes come with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS, cornering ABS, ride by wire, quickshifter, and traction control. The BMW S 1000 R also offers additional features like hill start assist and anti-wheelie control. The Yamaha MT-09 SP, on the other hand, comes with cruise control, which is not available on the BMW.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha MT-09 SP has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1430 mm compared to the BMW S 1000 R's 1450 mm. The seat height on the Yamaha is also slightly lower at 825 mm compared to the BMW's 830 mm. Both bikes have similar front and rear tire widths and diameters.

When it comes to fuel tank capacity, the BMW S 1000 R has a larger tank at 16.5 liters compared to the Yamaha MT-09 SP's 14 liters. This gives the BMW a slightly longer range of 266 km compared to the Yamaha's 280 km. However, the Yamaha has a slightly lower combined fuel consumption of 5 l/100km compared to the BMW's 6.2 l/100km.

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2022

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2022

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R offers a powerful engine, strong brakes, comfortable ergonomics, and a good standard equipment package. It also has an extensive range of accessories available, allowing riders to customize their bike to their liking. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 SP offers a lively, high-torque engine, extremely agile handling, top brakes, and a high-quality chassis, providing pure driving pleasure.

In terms of weaknesses, the BMW S 1000 R has a sluggish shift assistant and its optics may not be 100% coherent. The Yamaha MT-09 SP has a poorly legible TFT display, a rather hard seat, and the control of electronics could be more intuitive.

Overall, both the BMW S 1000 R 2022 and the Yamaha MT-09 SP 2022 are impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers more power and a larger fuel tank, while the Yamaha delivers a more agile and enjoyable riding experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2022 compared to Yamaha MT-09 SP 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022
Yamaha MT-09 SP 2022

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke62.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power165 HPEngine power119 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque93 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio11.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHC, Drag leverValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement889 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel120 mmTravel137 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel117 mmTravel142 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65.8 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail96 mmTrail108 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter298 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter245 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Hill start assist, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control, Anti-wheelieAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Cruise control, Traction control, Anti-wheelie

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,090 mmLength2,090 mm
WidthWidth812 mmWidth795 mm
HeightHeight1,115 mmHeight1,190 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,430 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height825 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)199 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)189 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16.5 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2, A
RangeRange266 kmRange280 km
Combined CO2 emissionsCombined CO2 emissions144 g/kmCombined CO2 emissions116 g/km
Combined fuel consumptionCombined fuel consumption6.2 l/100kmCombined fuel consumption5 l/100km

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2022

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2022

The fun bike MT-09 is at its best in the SP version! The extremely fun, lively three-cylinder engine feels like more than just 119 hp thanks to the abundance of torque. Add to that terrific, bike-like handling and phenomenal, finely controllable brakes. The upright, rear-facing riding position doesn't take away as much front-wheel feel in the MT-09 SP, as the high-quality chassis gives clean feedback from the road and rides every radius with stability. Unfortunately, as is typical for Yamaha, the clarity of the TFT display and the operating concept of the lush electronics leave a lot to be desired. The seat and pillion comfort could also be better. Otherwise, however, the MT-09 SP is the (almost) perfect bike for massive riding fun.

Lively, high-torque engine

Extremely agile handling

Top brakes

High-quality chassis

Pure driving pleasure!

Poorly legible TFT display

rather hard seat

control of electronics could be more intuitive

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Yamaha MT-09 SP

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2022 and a Yamaha MT-09 SP 2022. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2022 is about 49% higher. Compared to Yamaha MT-09 SP 2022 there are more BMW S 1000 R 2022 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 22 compared to 18. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 71 days compared to 104 days for a Yamaha MT-09 SP. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 29 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 SP since model year 2018. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 49,000 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 SP published on 06/11/2017.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09 SP

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH