Kawasaki Z 750 2010 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Kawasaki Z 750 2010

Kawasaki Z 750 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Loading...

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z 750 2010 compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Kawasaki Z 750 2010
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore68.4 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke50.9 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power106 HPEngine power131 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpm
TorqueTorque78 NmTorque105 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,300 rpmRpm at Torque7,550 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.3 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement748 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFixed caliper
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
LengthLength2,085 mmLength2,115 mm
WidthWidth805 mmWidth780 mm
HeightHeight1,100 mmHeight1,120 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,429 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18.5 lFuel Tank Capacity18 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z 750 2010

Kawasaki Z 750 2010

A good bike at a very good price, especially the upside-down fork is convincing.

improved torque curve

upside-down fork

aggressive engine

low price

high weight

4 hp less than the predecessor

not exactly effortless driving

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Euphoria spread through the long bends. The Triple is a bit more expensive than some Nippon Nakeds with cheap chassis and you can feel it. It remains stable, you can open the throttle hard and you hit the line exactly.

More power

increased torque

reduced weight

agility

greatly improved geometry

precise and fast.

>100kg people might have space problems.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z 750 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Price Kawasaki Z 750

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons