Benelli 502 C 2022 vs. Honda VFR 800 F 2014

Benelli 502 C 2022

Honda VFR 800 F 2014
Loading...
Technical Specifications Benelli 502 C 2022 compared to Honda VFR 800 F 2014
Benelli 502 C 2022
Honda VFR 800 F 2014
Engine and Drive Train
Bore | Bore | 69 mm | Bore | 72 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stroke | Stroke | 66.8 mm | Stroke | 48 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 48 HP | Engine power | 106 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 8,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 10,250 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 45 Nm | Torque | 75 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 5,000 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 8,500 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 11.5 | Compression Ratio | 11.8 |
Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Electric |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Valves per cylinder | Valves per cylinder | 4 | Valves per cylinder | 4 |
Valves | Valves | DOHC | Valves | DOHC |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
Displacement | Displacement | 500 ccm | Displacement | 782 ccm |
Suspension Rear
Suspension | Suspension | Swing arm | Suspension | Single swing arm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adjustment | Adjustment | Preload | Adjustment | Preload |
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Aluminium |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frame type | Frame type | Tubular | Frame type | Twin Tube |
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Four pistons | Piston | Four pistons |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Double piston |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 160 mm | Rear tyre width | 180 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 60 % | Rear tyre height | 55 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,280 mm | Length | 2,134 mm |
Width | Width | 940 mm | Width | 748 mm |
Height | Height | 1,140 mm | Height | 1,203 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,600 mm | Wheelbase | 1,460 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 750 mm | Seat Height | 789 mm |
Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 217 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 239 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 21 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 21.5 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A2 | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Benelli 502 C 2022

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Honda VFR 800 F 2014

The concept fits, both performance and comfort are tuned to the mid-range sports tourer. However, it is difficult to make comparisons with the competition - the VFR800F hardly has any. Other sports tourers are stronger, more unwieldy and weigh just as much.
Powerful impression
Optimal handling
Great sound
Pleasant handlebar position
Well-protecting windscreen.
Nix
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Benelli 502 C vs Honda VFR 800 F
Price Benelli 502 C
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Honda VFR 800 F
Model year
Current average market prices