KTM 1290 Super Adventure R 2022 vs. BMW R 1250 GS 2019

The KTM 1290 Super Adventure R 2022 and the BMW R 1250 GS 2019 are both powerful enduro motorcycles that offer a range of features and capabilities.

Starting with the engine and drive train, the KTM 1290 Super Adventure R 2022 is equipped with a V2 engine with a displacement of 1301ccm. It produces 160 HP of power and 138 Nm of torque. The engine is started electrically and power is transmitted through a chain. On the other hand, the BMW R 1250 GS 2019 features a Boxer engine with a displacement of 1254ccm. It generates 136 HP of power and 143 Nm of torque. The engine is also started electrically but power is transmitted through a prop shaft.

In terms of suspension, the KTM 1290 Super Adventure R 2022 has an upside-down telescopic fork with a diameter of 48mm at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. The front suspension offers a travel of 220mm and can be adjusted for compression, preload, and rebound. The rear suspension also has a travel of 220mm and can be adjusted for compression, preload, and rebound. On the other hand, the BMW R 1250 GS 2019 is equipped with a telelever front suspension with a diameter of 37mm and a single swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. The front suspension offers a travel of 190mm and can be adjusted for preload. The rear suspension has a travel of 200mm and can be adjusted for preload and rebound.

KTM 1290 Super Adventure R 2022

In terms of chassis, the KTM 1290 Super Adventure R 2022 features a chromium-molybdenum frame, while the BMW R 1250 GS 2019 has a steel frame. The KTM has a frame type of tubular, while the BMW has a load-bearing engine frame type. The rake of the KTM is 64.7 degrees and the trail is 112.8mm. The BMW has a rake of 62.9 degrees and a trail of 109mm.

Both motorcycles are equipped with double disk brakes at the front. The KTM has advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS, riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, and traction control. The BMW also has ABS, anti-slipping control, riding modes, and ride by wire.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the KTM 1290 Super Adventure R 2022 has a front tire diameter of 21 inches and a rear tire width of 150mm with a diameter of 18 inches. It has a wheelbase of 1577mm, a seat height of 880mm, and a fuel tank capacity of 23 liters. On the other hand, the BMW R 1250 GS 2019 has a front tire diameter of 19 inches and a rear tire width of 170mm with a diameter of 17 inches. It has a wheelbase of 1525mm, a seat height of 850mm, and a fuel tank capacity of 20 liters.

In terms of equipment, the KTM 1290 Super Adventure R 2022 is equipped with cornering lights, LED daytime running lights, LED headlights, a TFT display, and an adjustable windscreen. The BMW R 1250 GS 2019 is equipped with LED headlights and an adjustable windscreen. The BMW also has a color TFT display as standard.

BMW R 1250 GS 2019

In terms of strengths, the KTM 1290 Super Adventure R 2022 is praised for its sporty V2 power plant, playful handling, driving-friendly seating position, good brakes with cornering ABS, comprehensive electronics package, and clear, well-structured instruments with a large 7-inch display. On the other hand, the BMW R 1250 GS 2019 is praised for its high-torque boxer engine, good sound, comfortable seating position suitable for long distances, stable braking performance, good weather protection, and standard LED headlights.

In terms of weaknesses, the KTM 1290 Super Adventure R 2022 is criticized for its gearshift assistant being available at an extra cost and its higher price compared to the S model despite having fewer features. The BMW R 1250 GS 2019 is criticized for its manageable standard equipment and a long surcharge list, as well as its jagged appearance with little elegance.

In conclusion, both the KTM 1290 Super Adventure R 2022 and the BMW R 1250 GS 2019 offer impressive performance and features. The KTM excels in terms of its powerful engine, handling, and electronics package, while the BMW offers a comfortable riding position and good overall performance. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences and priorities.