Honda CB500F 2013 vs. Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Honda CB500F 2013
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Přehled - Honda CB500F 2013 vs Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
The Honda CB500F 2013 and the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience.
In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki ER-6n takes the lead with 72 HP compared to the Honda CB500F's 48 HP. This means that the Kawasaki ER-6n has a more powerful and faster acceleration, making it suitable for riders who crave speed and performance. However, the Honda CB500F's engine power is still respectable and provides a satisfying riding experience.
Both bikes have a liquid-cooled, in-line engine with two cylinders, ensuring efficient cooling and smooth performance. The Honda CB500F has a displacement of 471ccm, while the Kawasaki ER-6n has a larger displacement of 649ccm. This means that the Kawasaki ER-6n has a bigger engine, which contributes to its higher power output.
Honda CB500F 2013
In terms of chassis, both bikes feature a steel frame, providing stability and durability. The Honda CB500F offers agile and nimble handling, thanks to its relatively low overall weight. It also has an acceptable chassis and good comfort, making it suitable for both city commuting and longer rides. The Kawasaki ER-6n also offers solid handling, ensuring a confident and enjoyable riding experience.
When it comes to braking, the Kawasaki ER-6n has an advantage with its double disk front brakes compared to the Honda CB500F's single disk front brakes. This means that the Kawasaki ER-6n has better stopping power and control, enhancing safety and confidence while riding.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have similar front and rear tire widths and diameters. They also share the same wheelbase of 1410mm. However, there are slight differences in seat height and weight. The Honda CB500F has a lower seat height of 790mm, making it more accessible for riders with shorter inseams. It also has a lower kerb weight of 192kg (with ABS) compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n's 208kg (with ABS). This lower weight contributes to the Honda CB500F's agility and nimble handling.
Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity that allows for decent range. The Honda CB500F has a capacity of 15.7 liters, while the Kawasaki ER-6n has a slightly larger capacity of 16 liters.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
In terms of weaknesses, the Honda CB500F has been criticized for its partially shoddy workmanship, indicating potential quality issues. It also lacks a gear indicator, which can be inconvenient for riders who prefer to have this information readily available.
On the other hand, the Kawasaki ER-6n has been noted for its weak brake performance, which may require some adjustments or upgrades for riders seeking more responsive braking.
In conclusion, both the Honda CB500F 2013 and the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 offer exciting riding experiences with their respective strengths and weaknesses. The Honda CB500F provides a lighter and more agile ride, with a strong engine and comfortable seating position. The Kawasaki ER-6n offers solid handling and a higher power output, but may require some improvements in its braking system. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technické údaje Honda CB500F 2013 ve srovnání s Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Výhody a nevýhody ve srovnání
Výhody a nevýhody ve srovnání
Honda CB500F 2013
Takové drobnosti však nemohou zkazit dobrou image Hondy CB500F. Po prvních metrech nebylo pochyb o tom, že se jedná o vynikající volbu jako základní motocykl. Ale to, že dokáže splnit i vyšší nároky, je trochu překvapivé, zejména motor potěší svižnou odezvou a výrazným požitkem z otáček.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
Motor je vydatný a zábavný, navíc ER září japonskou pečlivostí a bojovou cenou.
Srovnání cen průměrná tržní cena Honda CB500F vs Kawasaki ER-6n
There are a few key differences between a Honda CB500F 2013 and a Kawasaki ER-6n 2013. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 5. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 42 days compared to 54 days for the Honda CB500F. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 22 reviews for the Honda CB500F and 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n since model year 2006. The first review for the Honda CB500F was published on 11/10/2012 and now has more than 18,500 views. This compares to more than 11,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki ER-6n published on 6/29/2005.
