KTM 890 Adventure R 2022 vs. Aprilia Tuareg 660 2022

The KTM 890 Adventure R 2022 and the Aprilia Tuareg 660 2022 are both enduro motorcycles designed for off-road adventures. While they share some similarities in terms of their technical specifications, they also have distinct differences that set them apart.

Starting with the engine and drive train, the KTM 890 Adventure R is equipped with a powerful in-line engine with a displacement of 889cc. It produces 105 horsepower and 100 Nm of torque, providing ample power for off-road riding. On the other hand, the Aprilia Tuareg 660 features an in-line crankpin offset engine with a displacement of 659cc. It has a slightly lower power output of 80 horsepower and 70 Nm of torque. While the KTM offers more power, the Aprilia is still capable of delivering a thrilling off-road experience.

In terms of suspension, both motorcycles feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension with monoshock absorbers at the rear. However, the KTM 890 Adventure R is equipped with WP suspension components, including a 48mm front fork diameter and a 240mm travel for both front and rear suspension. The Aprilia Tuareg 660, on the other hand, features Kayaba suspension components with a slightly smaller 43mm front fork diameter. However, it also offers a 240mm travel for both front and rear suspension, ensuring a comfortable ride over rough terrains.

KTM 890 Adventure R 2022

When it comes to the chassis, the KTM 890 Adventure R features a chromium-molybdenum frame, which is known for its strength and durability. The frame is of the tubular, load-bearing engine type, providing a solid foundation for off-road riding. On the other hand, the Aprilia Tuareg 660 has a steel frame of the tubular type, offering a sturdy and reliable structure.

In terms of braking, both motorcycles are equipped with double disk brakes at the front. The KTM 890 Adventure R does not specify the brand of its brakes, while the Aprilia Tuareg 660 features a reliable braking system. Both motorcycles also come with advanced rider assistance systems, including ABS, riding modes, and traction control, ensuring a safe and controlled riding experience.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both motorcycles feature a 21-inch front tire diameter and an 18-inch rear tire diameter. They also have a similar rear tire width of 150mm. The KTM 890 Adventure R has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1528mm compared to the Aprilia Tuareg 660's 1525mm. The seat height of the KTM is 880mm, which may be challenging for smaller riders, while the Aprilia offers a slightly lower seat height of 860mm. The dry weight of the KTM is 196kg, slightly heavier than the Aprilia's 187kg. Both motorcycles have a fuel tank capacity of around 18-20 liters, providing a decent range for long off-road adventures.

Aprilia Tuareg 660 2022

In terms of strengths, the KTM 890 Adventure R offers an off-road capable chassis, agile handling, and a powerful engine. It also has a comprehensive electronics package, including cornering ABS and traction control depending on lean angle. The Aprilia Tuareg 660 excels in handling and ergonomics, with well-tuned driving modes and easily adjustable traction control. It also comes with cruise control as standard.

However, both motorcycles have their weaknesses. The KTM 890 Adventure R has a standard seat that is rather hard-padded, making it less comfortable for long rides. The seat height may also be challenging for smaller riders. Additionally, the wind and weather protection provided by the KTM could be improved. The Aprilia Tuareg 660, on the other hand, does not come with a standard quickshifter, and some desirable features, such as the white-blue-red color variant, come at an extra cost. The wind protection could also be better on the Aprilia.

In conclusion, the KTM 890 Adventure R 2022 and the Aprilia Tuareg 660 2022 are both capable enduro motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The KTM offers more power and a comprehensive electronics package, while the Aprilia excels in handling and ergonomics. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.