Ducati Monster 696 2008 vs. Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
Ducati Monster 696 2008
Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
Přehled - Ducati Monster 696 2008 vs Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
The Ducati Monster 696 2008 and the Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 are both naked bikes that were released in the same year. While they have some similarities in terms of engine specifications, there are also notable differences in their design, performance, and ergonomics.
Starting with the engine and drive train, both motorcycles have a 2-cylinder engine. The Ducati Monster 696 has a slightly more powerful engine with 80 HP compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n's 72 HP. However, the Kawasaki ER-6n has a liquid cooling system, which is generally considered more efficient than the oil-air cooling system used in the Ducati Monster 696. In terms of displacement, the Ducati Monster 696 has a 696ccm engine, while the Kawasaki ER-6n has a slightly larger 649ccm engine.
Ducati Monster 696 2008
Moving on to dimensions and weights, the Ducati Monster 696 has a longer wheelbase of 1452mm compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n's 1405mm. This may contribute to the Ducati's stability and handling. However, the Kawasaki ER-6n has a slightly higher seat height of 785mm compared to the Ducati Monster 696's 770mm. The dry weight of the Ducati Monster 696 is lighter at 163kg, while the Kawasaki ER-6n weighs 179kg. This makes the Ducati Monster 696 slightly more agile and easier to maneuver.
In terms of fuel tank capacity, both motorcycles have similar capacities, with the Ducati Monster 696 having a 15-liter tank and the Kawasaki ER-6n having a slightly larger 15.5-liter tank. This means that both bikes have a decent range for long rides.
Now let's discuss the strengths of each motorcycle. The Ducati Monster 696 is known for its comfort, providing a great ride experience for the rider. It also boasts excellent brakes, ensuring reliable stopping power. On the other hand, the Kawasaki ER-6n is praised for its lightness, precision, and rideability. It has a modern and dynamic look, making it visually appealing. The Kawasaki ER-6n is also considered beginner-friendly, with trustworthy ergonomics and the added safety feature of ABS.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
However, both motorcycles have their weaknesses. The Ducati Monster 696's design is not considered as sophisticated as some other models in its class. Additionally, its chassis is relatively complicated, which may not be suitable for beginners who are still getting used to riding. As for the Kawasaki ER-6n, taller riders above 1.80m may find the sitting position uncomfortable due to the footrests. Furthermore, the Kawasaki ER-6n is not particularly suitable for performing wheelies.
In conclusion, the Ducati Monster 696 2008 and the Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 are both solid naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Ducati Monster 696 offers a comfortable ride and reliable brakes, while the Kawasaki ER-6n is praised for its lightness, precision, and beginner-friendly features. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technické údaje Ducati Monster 696 2008 ve srovnání s Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
Výhody a nevýhody ve srovnání
Výhody a nevýhody ve srovnání
Ducati Monster 696 2008
Bude zajímavé sledovat, jak nový design přijmou staří fanoušci a zda osloví dostatek nových fanoušků. Každopádně nejmenší Monster udělal z hlediska výkonu velký krok vpřed.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
Kawasaki nevyrábí hračky. Model ER-6N je stále serióznější - a přitom zůstává vhodný pro začátečníky.
Srovnání cen průměrná tržní cena Ducati Monster 696 vs Kawasaki ER-6n
There are a few key differences between a Ducati Monster 696 2008 and a Kawasaki ER-6n 2008. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 7. It takes less time to sell a Ducati Monster 696 with 56 days compared to 57 days for a Kawasaki ER-6n. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 9 reviews for the Ducati Monster 696 and 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n since model year 2006. The first review for the Ducati Monster 696 was published on 11/8/2007 and now has more than 7,300 views. This compares to more than 11,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki ER-6n published on 6/29/2005.
