Yamaha MT-07 2016 vs. Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012
Yamaha MT-07 2016
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012
Přehled - Yamaha MT-07 2016 vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012
The Yamaha MT-07 2016 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. However, there are notable differences between the two models.
In terms of engine performance, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 has a more powerful engine, with 106 HP compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2016's 75 HP. Both bikes have the same torque of 68 Nm. The Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a smaller engine displacement of 689 ccm, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 has a larger displacement of 675 ccm.
Yamaha MT-07 2016
In terms of suspension, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a telescopic fork front suspension, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 has an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension. This difference in suspension design may result in slight variations in handling and performance.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the two bikes have similar front and rear tyre widths and diameters. The Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1400 mm, compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012's 1410 mm. Both bikes have the same seat height of 805 mm. The Yamaha MT-07 2016 has a slightly higher kerb weight of 179 kg, compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012's 167 kg. The Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.4 l, compared to the Yamaha MT-07 2016's 14 l.
In terms of strengths, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 is praised for its very agile engine, easy handling, low weight, aggressive angular look, powerful brakes, comfortable seating position, throaty sound, and extensive and easy-to-read display. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 is commended for its lighter weight, improved performance, light-footed handling, and practicality in curves. It also offers a comfortable upright sitting position.
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012
In terms of weaknesses, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 is criticized for its slightly soft chassis, footrests that may drag, and the presence of some cheap plastic parts. It is also noted that the telescopic fork is considered boring. The Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012's only weakness mentioned is the lack of included ABS, although it is noted that it is not expensive to purchase separately.
Overall, the Yamaha MT-07 2016 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 are both strong contenders in the naked bike category, with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technické údaje Yamaha MT-07 2016 ve srovnání s Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012
Výhody a nevýhody ve srovnání
Výhody a nevýhody ve srovnání
Yamaha MT-07 2016
MT-07 je neuvěřitelně zábavný stroj, na kterém se jezdí velmi sportovně. Brzdy jsou úderné, jízdní vlastnosti vynikající a motor je v současnosti zdaleka nejsvižnější pohonnou jednotkou v této třídě - a dokonce i výše.
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012
Stačí sebemenší impuls a malá angličanka se otočí přesně tak, jak chcete. Tato ovladatelnost nemá ve třídě středně velkých naháčů rovněž obdoby. Motocykl, který se dá takto sportovně rozpohybovat, by si nezasloužil být zneužíván jako kilometrový žrout a cestovní parník.
Srovnání cen průměrná tržní cena Yamaha MT-07 vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-07 2016 and a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 24. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-07 with 51 days compared to 73 days for a Triumph Street Triple 675 R. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 69 reviews for the Yamaha MT-07 and 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R since model year 2009. The first review for the Yamaha MT-07 was published on 11/4/2013 and now has more than 12,600 views. This compares to more than 13,000 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 675 R published on 7/20/2008.
