Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017 vs. Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017

Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017 vs Yamaha XSR900 2018

The Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017 is a naked bike with a magnificent design and the highest level of exclusivity. It is equipped with a strong three-cylinder engine that delivers 115 horsepower and 87.5 Nm of torque. The engine is cooled by a liquid cooling system and has a displacement of 847cc. The bike features a Twin Tube aluminum frame and a swing arm suspension with a monoshock absorber. The front suspension is an upside-down telescopic fork. The brakes on the front are double disk with a diameter of 298mm. The bike also comes with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS and traction control. The front tire has a width of 120mm and a diameter of 17 inches, while the rear tire has a width of 180mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is 1440mm and the seat height is 830mm. The bike has a kerb weight of 195kg with ABS and a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters.

On the other hand, the Yamaha XSR900 2018 also has a similar technical specification to the Abarth model. It is equipped with the same in-line three-cylinder engine that delivers 115 horsepower and 87.5 Nm of torque. The engine is cooled by a liquid cooling system and has a displacement of 847cc. The bike features a Twin Tube aluminum frame and a swing arm suspension with a monoshock absorber. The front suspension is an upside-down telescopic fork. The brakes on the front are double disk with a diameter of 298mm. The bike also comes with ABS as an advanced rider assistance system. The front tire has a width of 120mm and a diameter of 17 inches, while the rear tire has a width of 180mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is 1440mm and the seat height is 815mm. The bike has a kerb weight of 191kg with ABS and a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters.

Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017

Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017 stands out for its magnificent design and highest level of exclusivity. It also has a strong three-cylinder engine, powerful brakes, and agile handling. The inclusion of traction control as standard is another advantage.

On the other hand, the Yamaha XSR900 2018 is praised for its extremely sporty and rev-happy engine, excellent brakes, and the ability to ride at a naked bike level. It also offers a pleasant seating position and high-quality workmanship. The price-performance ratio is considered to be favorable.

However, both models have their weaknesses. The Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017 has a very low positioned handlebar, which may not be comfortable for all riders. Additionally, the high price of the Abarth model may be a deterrent for some buyers.

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 2018

On the other hand, the Yamaha XSR900 2018 is criticized for its almost too direct response, which may require more skillful handling from the rider. Some also feel that the retro style of the bike is not thought through to the last detail.

In conclusion, both the Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017 and the Yamaha XSR900 2018 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Abarth model offers a magnificent design and exclusivity, while the 2018 model provides a sporty engine and a favorable price-performance ratio. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the individual preferences and priorities of the buyer.

Technical Specifications Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017 compared to Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017
Yamaha XSR900 2018
Show all
Same only
Differences
Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017
Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017
Yamaha XSR900 2018
Yamaha XSR900 2018

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio11.5
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionTransistorIgnitionTransistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel137 mmTravel137 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel130 mmTravel130 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail103 mmTrail103 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter298 mmDiameter298 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter245 mmDiameter245 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,135 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)195 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)191 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017

Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017

Basically, it hardly matters whether I think the Yamaha XSR900 Abarth is good or bad - the first 95 of the 695 units worldwide were sold out within 20 minutes. So there's no need to worry about the remaining 600. Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that the Abarth version looks enormously good with the carbon fairings front and rear, the Akrapovic exhaust and the suede saddle. The low handlebars are not as comfortable as the conventional XSR900, but fit perfectly with this stylish appearance. The engine, chassis and brakes work just like on the normal XSR900 - in other words, extremely sporty and wonderfully rideable.

magnificent design

highest exclusivity

strong three-cylinder engine

powerful brakes

agile handling

traction control standard

Very low positioned handlebar

high price

Yamaha XSR900 2018

Yamaha XSR900 2018

The Yamaha XSR900 is a classic optical illusion - with its round headlight, angular tank and attached tail light, it clearly passes for a retro bike. But it's no coincidence that the performance is reminiscent of the potent mid-range naked bike Yamaha MT-09, which is the extremely sporty basis for the XSR900. So the engine is a blast and the brakes are appropriately venomous. Fortunately, the engineers didn't overdo it with the chassis, the XSR900 offers sufficient comfort and the upright riding position is more comfortable than the powerful engine would lead one to expect. All in all, the XSR900 is one of the sportiest models among the retro bikes.

Extremely sporty and rev-happy engine

excellent brakes

riding at naked bike level

pleasant seating position

high-quality workmanship

price-performance ratio.

almost too direct response

retro style not thought through to the last detail

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha XSR900 Abarth vs Yamaha XSR900

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017 and a Yamaha XSR900 2018. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XSR900 with 123 days compared to 189 days for the Yamaha XSR900 Abarth. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 3 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 Abarth and 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 since model year 2016. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 Abarth was published on 11/7/2016 and now has more than 24,100 views. This compares to more than 17,600 views for the first review on Yamaha XSR900 published on 11/25/2015.

Price Yamaha XSR900 Abarth

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen