Ducati Monster 696 2013 vs. Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

Ducati Monster 696 2013

Ducati Monster 696 2013

Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

Loading...

Overview - Ducati Monster 696 2013 vs Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

The Ducati Monster 696 and the Ducati Monster 1100 Evo are both naked bikes from the 2013 model year. While they share some similarities in terms of engine power, torque, and suspension brands, there are also notable differences between the two models.

Starting with the engine and drive train, the Ducati Monster 696 is equipped with a 696cc engine that produces 80 horsepower and 69 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Ducati Monster 1100 Evo features a larger 1078cc engine that delivers 100 horsepower and 103 Nm of torque. This means that the Monster 1100 Evo has a more powerful engine, offering greater acceleration and top speed compared to the Monster 696.

Both models have a 2-cylinder engine and air cooling, which is a characteristic of Ducati motorcycles. This type of cooling system provides simplicity and reliability, but it may not be as effective as liquid cooling in extreme conditions.

Ducati Monster 696 2013

Ducati Monster 696 2013

In terms of suspension, both the Monster 696 and the Monster 1100 Evo are equipped with Sachs suspension components. This brand is known for its high-quality and performance-oriented suspension systems, providing a comfortable and controlled ride. This ensures that both bikes offer a smooth and stable handling experience.

When it comes to dimensions and weights, both models have similar front tire width and diameter, with 120 mm and 17 inches respectively. However, there is a difference in the rear tire width, with the Monster 696 having a 160 mm width and the Monster 1100 Evo having a wider 180 mm width. This wider rear tire on the Monster 1100 Evo provides increased traction and stability during cornering.

Both bikes have the same wheelbase of 1450 mm, which contributes to their stability and maneuverability. However, there is a difference in seat height, with the Monster 696 having a lower seat height of 770 mm compared to the Monster 1100 Evo's 810 mm. This means that the Monster 696 is more accessible for riders with shorter inseams, while the Monster 1100 Evo may be more suitable for taller riders.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Monster 696 has a larger capacity of 15 liters compared to the Monster 1100 Evo's 13.5 liters. This means that the Monster 696 has a slightly longer range before needing to refuel.

Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

Moving on to the strengths and weaknesses of each model, the Monster 696 is praised for its top engine performance, high-quality components, and the distinctive throaty sound that is characteristic of Ducati motorcycles. However, it is criticized for its high price and poorly readable fittings.

On the other hand, the Monster 1100 Evo is praised for its enormous torque, which provides a thrilling riding experience, and its manageability, making it easy to handle even in challenging situations. However, it is criticized for its noticeable load changes and poorly readable instruments.

In conclusion, the Ducati Monster 696 and the Ducati Monster 1100 Evo are both impressive naked bikes from the 2013 model year. While the Monster 696 offers a top engine performance and high-quality components, the Monster 1100 Evo stands out with its enormous torque and manageability. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Ducati Monster 696 2013 compared to Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

Ducati Monster 696 2013
Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013
Show all
Same only
Differences
Ducati Monster 696 2013
Ducati Monster 696 2013
Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013
Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height60 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height770 mmSeat Height810 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity13.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Ducati Monster 696 2013

Ducati Monster 696 2013

The Ducati looks wonderful, has high-quality components, has a good-sounding engine, but unfortunately also has a salty price.

Top engine

high-quality components

throaty Ducati sound

High price

poorly readable fittings

Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013

It is the modern definition of classic-elegant sportiness.

Enormous torque

radically manageable

Noticeable load changes

poorly readable instruments

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Ducati Monster 696 vs Ducati Monster 1100 Evo

There are a few key differences between a Ducati Monster 696 2013 and a Ducati Monster 1100 Evo 2013. It takes less time to sell a Ducati Monster 696 with 55 days compared to 92 days for a Ducati Monster 1100 Evo. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 9 reviews for the Ducati Monster 696 and 5 reviews for the Ducati Monster 1100 Evo since model year 2010. The first review for the Ducati Monster 696 was published on 11/8/2007 and now has more than 7,300 views. This compares to more than 16,000 views for the first review on Ducati Monster 1100 Evo published on 5/19/2011.

Price Ducati Monster 696

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Ducati Monster 1100 Evo

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen