Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016 vs. Husqvarna WR 125 2013

Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016

Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016

Husqvarna WR 125 2013

Husqvarna WR 125 2013

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016 vs Husqvarna WR 125 2013

Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016

Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016

Husqvarna WR 125 2013

Husqvarna WR 125 2013

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016 compared to Husqvarna WR 125 2013

Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016
Husqvarna WR 125 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore72.7 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke65.2 mmStroke54.5 mm
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement271 ccmDisplacement124 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width220 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter10 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width220 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height100 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter10 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12 lFuel Tank Capacity7 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Brute Force 300 vs Husqvarna WR 125

Price Kawasaki Brute Force 300

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna WR 125

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG