Triumph Tiger 800 2011 vs. BMW F 700 GS 2016

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Tiger 800 2011 vs BMW F 700 GS 2016

The Triumph Tiger 800 2011 and the BMW F 700 GS 2016 are both enduro motorcycles that offer their own unique set of features and capabilities.

In terms of engine and drive train, the Triumph Tiger 800 2011 has a bore of 74 mm and a stroke of 61.9 mm, while the BMW F 700 GS 2016 has a larger bore of 82 mm and a stroke of 75.6 mm. The Tiger 800 has a higher engine power of 95 HP compared to the F 700 GS's 75 HP. However, the F 700 GS has a slightly higher torque of 77 Nm compared to the Tiger 800's 79 Nm. Both motorcycles have a chain transmission and a similar displacement of around 800 ccm.

In terms of assistance systems, both motorcycles are equipped with advanced rider assistance systems. The Tiger 800 has ABS, which provides added safety during braking, while the F 700 GS has electronically adjustable suspension, allowing for a more customized and comfortable ride.

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

When it comes to dimensions and weights, both motorcycles have a front tyre diameter of 19 inches and a rear tyre diameter of 17 inches. The Tiger 800 has a wider rear tyre width of 150 mm compared to the F 700 GS's 140 mm. The wheelbase of the Tiger 800 is slightly shorter at 1555 mm, while the F 700 GS has a wheelbase of 1562 mm. The seat height of the Tiger 800 is higher at 830 mm compared to the F 700 GS's 820 mm. The Tiger 800 also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 19 liters compared to the F 700 GS's 16 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Tiger 800 offers a homogeneous power development, providing a smooth and consistent ride. It also has a loud sound, which can be appealing to some riders. Additionally, the Tiger 800 is equipped with ABS, enhancing safety during braking.

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

On the other hand, the F 700 GS has its own set of strengths. It is described as very manageable and surprisingly powerful, making it a great option for riders of all skill levels. The F 700 GS also offers a comfortable seating position and a low seat height, making it easier for riders to reach the ground. The brakes on the F 700 GS are also praised for their performance, providing good stopping power. Furthermore, the F 700 GS is considered to have a good price, offering value for money.

In terms of weaknesses, the Tiger 800 is noted to have a somewhat stiff gearbox during lively gear changes. On the other hand, the F 700 GS is described as having less appealing optics.

Overall, both the Triumph Tiger 800 2011 and the BMW F 700 GS 2016 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Tiger 800 offers a powerful and smooth ride, while the F 700 GS is praised for its manageability and comfort. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Tiger 800 2011 compared to BMW F 700 GS 2016

Triumph Tiger 800 2011
BMW F 700 GS 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore74 mmBore82 mm
StrokeStroke61.9 mmStroke75.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power95 HPEngine power75 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,300 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,300 rpm
TorqueTorque79 NmTorque77 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,850 rpmRpm at Torque5,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders2
DisplacementDisplacement799 ccmDisplacement798 ccm

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsSuspension electronically adjustable

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height80 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter19 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,215 mmLength2,280 mm
WidthWidth795 mmWidth855 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,555 mmWheelbase1,562 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height820 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity19 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

Triumph Tiger 800 2011

It seems Triumph has built a motorbike that has made the most pronounced trait in wildcats - suppleness - the overriding principle of its dynamics. The Tiger is elegant, controlled and deliberate in the use of its power.

Homogeneous power development

smooth ride

loud sound

ABS.

Gearbox somewhat stiff during lively gear changes.

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

The smaller of the two F GS sisters, the F 700 GS convinces with a successful overall performance. It looks like its big sister, but at its core it is more of a lively naked bike than a big enduro. The fact that the bike has outgrown the entry-level segment can be seen in the braking system - with two brake discs at the front, it is on a par with its big 800 sister and now decelerates just as confidently. In terms of the chassis, it convinces with good suspension comfort and at the same time a firm set-up in tight bends. Upgrading is never a problem with BMW; in addition to traction control, there is also the electronic suspension ESA for the F 700 GS.

Very manageable

surprisingly powerful

comfortable seating position

low seat height

good brakes

good price.

any optics

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Tiger 800 vs BMW F 700 GS

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Tiger 800 2011 and a BMW F 700 GS 2016. In terms of price, the actual average prices of both motorbikes are almost the same. Compared to BMW F 700 GS 2016 there are less Triumph Tiger 800 2011 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 7 compared to 15. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Tiger 800 with 46 days compared to 90 days for a BMW F 700 GS. Since model year 2011 1000PS.de editors have written 10 reviews for the Triumph Tiger 800 and 7 reviews for the BMW F 700 GS since model year 2013. The first review for the Triumph Tiger 800 was published on 11/1/2010 and now has more than 8,200 views. This compares to more than 18,800 views for the first review on BMW F 700 GS published on 7/2/2012.

Price Triumph Tiger 800

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 700 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG