Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016 vs. Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016

Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016 vs Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016

Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016 compared to Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016
Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore72.7 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke65.2 mmStroke54.5 mm
IgnitionIgnitionCDI, DigitalIgnitionKokusan
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement271 ccmDisplacement124.8 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width220 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter10 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width220 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height100 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter10 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016

Kawasaki Brute Force 300 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

The beginner enduro for riders who want to do everything right from the start. Does not forgive shifting errors and always wants to be ridden in the right rev range. In 2017, the 125 was made even lighter - dry, the 125 weighs just 92 kg.

cheapest model

easy handling

best learning effect

Less forgiving of mistakes

limited engine power

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG