Triumph Street Triple S 2018 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2017

Triumph Street Triple S 2018

Triumph Street Triple S 2018

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Street Triple S 2018 vs Yamaha MT-09 2017

The Triumph Street Triple S 2018 and the Yamaha MT-09 2017 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, power, torque, fuel systems, cylinders, cooling systems, and suspension setups. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Triumph Street Triple S 2018 has 113 HP, while the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has a slightly higher power output of 115 HP. This difference in power may not be significant in practical terms, but it could be a deciding factor for some riders.

When it comes to torque, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has a higher value of 87.5 Nm compared to the 73 Nm of the Triumph Street Triple S 2018. This means that the Yamaha MT-09 2017 may offer better acceleration and low-end grunt.

Triumph Street Triple S 2018

Triumph Street Triple S 2018

Both bikes have similar suspension setups, with upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. This configuration provides good stability and handling for both models.

In terms of braking, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front, but there is a slight difference in the diameter. The Triumph Street Triple S 2018 has larger front brakes with a diameter of 310 mm, while the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has slightly smaller front brakes with a diameter of 298 mm. This could result in slightly better braking performance for the Triumph Street Triple S 2018.

Both bikes also come with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS and traction control. However, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has an additional feature of a quickshifter, which allows for clutchless upshifts. This can enhance the riding experience and provide smoother gear changes.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1440 mm compared to the 1410 mm of the Triumph Street Triple S 2018. The seat height of the Yamaha MT-09 2017 is also slightly higher at 815 mm compared to the 810 mm of the Triumph Street Triple S 2018. However, the Triumph Street Triple S 2018 has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.4 liters compared to the 14 liters of the Yamaha MT-09 2017. This means that the Triumph Street Triple S 2018 may offer a longer range between refueling stops.

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

In terms of strengths, the Triumph Street Triple S 2018 is praised for its great handling, brilliant sound, beautiful looks, comfortable seat, big tank, and two riding modes. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 2017 is praised for its Öhlins suspension, improved optics and sound with Akrapovic, excellent braking performance with the Magura HC3 radial brake pump, and grandiose optics with Carbon2Race covers.

In terms of weaknesses, the Triumph Street Triple S 2018 is criticized for its chassis and technical equipment, which leave room for improvement. The Yamaha MT-09 2017 has weaknesses in terms of financial outlay, requiring a lot of working time, certain parts needing to be registered, and the ECU Flash not being road legal.

Overall, both the Triumph Street Triple S 2018 and the Yamaha MT-09 2017 are capable naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two models would depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Street Triple S 2018 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2017

Triumph Street Triple S 2018
Yamaha MT-09 2017
Show all
Same only
Differences
Triumph Street Triple S 2018
Triumph Street Triple S 2018
Yamaha MT-09 2017
Yamaha MT-09 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke53.4 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power113 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque73 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,100 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.65 Compression Ratio11.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement765 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel110 mmTravel137 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel124 mmTravel130 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65.2 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail104.3 mmTrail103 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter298 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter245 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Quickshifter, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,065 mmLength2,075 mm
HeightHeight1,060 mmHeight1,120 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height810 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.4 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Street Triple S 2018

Triumph Street Triple S 2018

Clean responsiveness, great sound and a driving position - the Street Triple S offers a comfortable yet sporty riding experience. The naked bike rides with exceptional precision and agility and offers a lot of comfort, even on longer rides, where you can also enjoy the large 17.4-litre fuel tank. The electronic throttle control ensures precise response and makes it possible to set different riding modes. We also found the comparatively low vibrations for a triple and the pleasant geometry of the vehicle positive. Compared to the other bikes in the test and its two siblings, the R and RS, the chassis is a little lax - but the ingenious, husky roaring three-cylinder sound was convincing and definitely made our hearts beat faster!

Great handling

Brilliant sound

Beautiful looks

Comfortable seat

Big tank

2 riding modes

Chassis and technical equipment leave room for improvement

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

In conclusion, after several stops throughout the season, I can look back on a great result. Both in terms of performance and looks, our MT-09 is perfect. The suspension was probably our most important issue. Where before there was clearly (too much) movement in the rear in fast corners, now it is ironed over without batting an eyelid. The STX 46 shock absorber is quite stiff in its basic configuration, but also manages to get through everyday life without being uncomfortable. Thanks to generous adjustment options, there is still room for individual preferences and uses. The function of the NIX 30 cartridge is also impressive. The response behaviour - especially under load - has improved significantly. There is now also much more reserve available when braking. Where before the fork went into block and the ABS triggered when braking hard with the original set-up, now the brakes simply continue to work effectively. In addition, the MT-09 now follows the intended line in the curve radius as if by itself - a pure pleasure. The sight and sound of the Akrapovic complete system are also pure joy, and the fact that it produces a few more horsepower is felt effectively, especially in the upper third of the rev range. The front wheel shoots even more willingly into the gallery in 2nd and 3rd gear.

Öhlins suspension an extreme enrichment

thanks to Akrapovic now optics and sound are right

Magura HC3 radial brake pump works divinely

Carbon2Race covers offer grandiose optics

combination of seat, footrests and handlebar clamps very effective

Financial outlay

lots of working time

certain parts must be registered

ECU Flash not road legal

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Street Triple S vs Yamaha MT-09

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Street Triple S 2018 and a Yamaha MT-09 2017. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 73 days compared to 82 days for the Triumph Street Triple S. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 3 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple S and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Triumph Street Triple S was published on 1/10/2017 and now has more than 58,400 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 6/10/2013.

Price Triumph Street Triple S

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen