Yamaha XJ6 2009 vs. Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha XJ6 2009 vs Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

In terms of technical specifications, the Yamaha XJ6 2009 has a more powerful engine with 78 HP compared to the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 which has 72 HP. However, the ER-6n has a higher torque of 64 Nm compared to the XJ6's 59.7 Nm. The XJ6 has 4 cylinders while the ER-6n has 2 cylinders. Both bikes have liquid cooling systems and similar displacement, with the XJ6 at 600ccm and the ER-6n at 649ccm.

In terms of chassis, both bikes have a steel frame. However, the XJ6 has a double cradle frame type while the ER-6n has a perimeter frame type. Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front and 17-inch diameter tires at the front and rear.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the XJ6 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1440 mm compared to the ER-6n's 1410 mm. The seat height of the XJ6 is lower at 785 mm compared to the ER-6n's 805 mm. The XJ6 also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.3 liters compared to the ER-6n's 16 liters.

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Now let's discuss the strengths of each bike. The Yamaha XJ6 2009 is known for its rider-friendly performance characteristics, making it suitable for both beginners and experienced riders. It has an optimal clutch and offers playful, lighter handling, making it easy to maneuver. The seat comfort is also praised by riders. In terms of design, the XJ6 has an individual look with a young and aggressive appearance. The overall build quality is considered to be high and the bike is known for its reliability.

On the other hand, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 is praised for its solid handling. It offers a stable and confident ride, making it suitable for riders who prefer a more controlled and precise riding experience. The overall build quality of the ER-6n is also considered to be high, ensuring durability and longevity.

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

However, both bikes have their weaknesses as well. The Yamaha XJ6 2009 is criticized for its design components not being too demanding, which may not appeal to riders looking for a more visually striking bike. Additionally, some riders find the torque development of the XJ6 to be lacking compared to other bikes in its class.

On the other hand, the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 is noted to have weak brakes, which may be a concern for riders who prioritize strong braking performance.

In conclusion, the Yamaha XJ6 2009 and the Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The XJ6 offers rider-friendly performance, playful handling, and an individual look, while the ER-6n provides solid handling and a high-quality build. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha XJ6 2009 compared to Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Yamaha XJ6 2009
Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore65.5 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke44.5 mmStroke60 mm
Engine powerEngine power78 HPEngine power72 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
TorqueTorque59.7 NmTorque64 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.2 Compression Ratio10.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement600 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typePerimeter

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,120 mmLength2,110 mm
WidthWidth770 mmWidth770 mm
HeightHeight1,085 mmHeight1,110 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height805 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.3 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Yamaha XJ6 2009

Despite the common basis, the XJ appears much younger and more aggressive. A mid-cass motorbike that by no means makes you feel mid-range. Except for the swingarm, the motorbike appears quite high-quality and cool. The bike is a little easier to handle than the Diversion.

rider-friendly performance characteristics

optimal clutch

playful, lighter handling

seat comfort

individual look

young

aggressive

high-quality.

Design components not too demanding

torque development

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

The engine is hearty and a lot of fun, plus the ER shines with a Japanese meticulous finish and a fighting price.

Solid handling

high quality level

weak brake

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha XJ6 vs Kawasaki ER-6n

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XJ6 2009 and a Kawasaki ER-6n 2013. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 6. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XJ6 with 31 days compared to 42 days for a Kawasaki ER-6n. Since model year 2009 1000PS.de editors have written 4 reviews for the Yamaha XJ6 and 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n since model year 2006. The first review for the Yamaha XJ6 was published on 11/13/2008 and now has more than 21,900 views. This compares to more than 11,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki ER-6n published on 6/29/2005.

Price Yamaha XJ6

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG