Suzuki Burgman 400 2017 vs. BMW C 650 GT 2012

Suzuki Burgman 400 2017

Suzuki Burgman 400 2017

BMW C 650 GT 2012

BMW C 650 GT 2012

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki Burgman 400 2017 vs BMW C 650 GT 2012

The Suzuki Burgman 400 2017 and the BMW C 650 GT 2012 are both popular scooter models that offer their own unique features and strengths.

Starting with the Suzuki Burgman 400 2017, it is equipped with a 34 HP engine and 36.3 Nm of torque, providing a lively and responsive ride. The transmission is a belt-driven variomatic, which offers smooth and seamless gear changes. The scooter has a single cylinder, 4-stroke engine with a displacement of 400ccm, making it suitable for urban commuting and longer rides.

In terms of braking, the Burgman 400 features double disk brakes in the front and a disc brake in the rear, ensuring reliable and efficient stopping power. The scooter has a sleek design and a stable chassis, allowing for easy maneuverability and control. The front tire has a width of 120mm and a diameter of 14 inches, while the rear tire has a width of 150mm and a diameter of 13 inches. The wheelbase measures 1585mm, providing stability and balance.

Suzuki Burgman 400 2017

Suzuki Burgman 400 2017

The seat height of the Burgman 400 is 710mm, offering a comfortable seating position for riders of various heights. The scooter has a kerb weight of 222kg (with ABS) and a fuel tank capacity of 13.5 liters, allowing for longer rides without frequent refueling.

Some of the strengths of the Suzuki Burgman 400 2017 include its lively engine, optimally tuned automatic transmission, sleek design, stable chassis, comfortable seating position, and plenty of comfort. However, it does have a few weaknesses, such as the front brake requiring manual force and the storage space being smaller than its predecessor.

Moving on to the BMW C 650 GT 2012, it is equipped with a more powerful 60 HP engine and 66 Nm of torque, providing a fast and exhilarating ride. The transmission is a chain-driven variomatic, similar to the Burgman 400, offering smooth and efficient gear changes. The scooter has a twin-cylinder, 4-stroke engine with a displacement of 647ccm, making it suitable for both city commuting and highway cruising.

In terms of braking, the C 650 GT features double disk brakes in the front and a disc brake in the rear, ensuring excellent stopping power. The scooter has a bulbous rear design, which increases storage space compared to the Burgman 400. The front tire has a width of 120mm and a diameter of 15 inches, while the rear tire has a width of 160mm and a diameter of 15 inches. The wheelbase measures 1591mm, providing stability and agility.

BMW C 650 GT 2012

BMW C 650 GT 2012

The seat height of the C 650 GT is 780mm, offering a more comfortable seating position for taller riders. The scooter has a kerb weight of 261kg (with ABS) and a fuel tank capacity of 16 liters, allowing for longer rides without frequent refueling.

Some of the strengths of the BMW C 650 GT 2012 include its electrically adjustable windshield, increased storage space, more comfortable seat, and extremely fast performance. However, it does have a few weaknesses, such as being very heavy and having a conservative appearance.

In conclusion, the Suzuki Burgman 400 2017 and the BMW C 650 GT 2012 are both reliable and capable scooter models, each with their own unique features and strengths. The Burgman 400 offers a lively engine, sleek design, and comfortable seating position, while the C 650 GT provides a more powerful engine, increased storage space, and a more comfortable seat for taller riders. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Suzuki Burgman 400 2017 compared to BMW C 650 GT 2012

Suzuki Burgman 400 2017
BMW C 650 GT 2012

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore81 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke77.6 mmStroke66 mm
Engine powerEngine power34 HPEngine power60 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,300 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpm
TorqueTorque36.3 NmTorque66 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,800 rpmRpm at Torque6,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.2 Compression Ratio11.6
TransmissionTransmissionBeltTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeVariomaticTransmission TypeVariomatic
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement400 ccmDisplacement647 ccm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter14 inchFront tyre diameter15 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter13 inchRear tyre diameter15 inch
LengthLength2,270 mmLength2,218 mm
WidthWidth760 mmWidth822 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,585 mmWheelbase1,591 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height710 mmSeat Height780 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)222 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)261 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity13.5 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki Burgman 400 2017

Suzuki Burgman 400 2017

The Burgman 400 has been in Suzuki's service since 1998, but it has never been as sporty as the latest generation. Comfort and luxury features are by no means lacking, but the lively engine and the somewhat firmer chassis, together with the larger 15-inch front wheel, ensure a lot of fun and stability even with a somewhat more ambitious riding style. The storage space under the now better-padded seat has been reduced by a third, but a full-face helmet and a jet helmet fit in perfectly. On the other hand, the narrower rear end significantly supports the sleek design and makes the Burgman 400 a somewhat sportier comfort and luxury scooter.

lively engine

optimally tuned automatic

sleek design

stable chassis

comfortable seating position

plenty of comfort

Front brake requires manual force

storage space smaller than with predecessor

BMW C 650 GT 2012

BMW C 650 GT 2012

It is more pleasant, quieter and has a wider range of use overall. Nevertheless, it is not slower. A really great production that no one would have expected.

Electrically adjustable windshield

bulbous rear

increased storage space

more comfortable seat

extremely fast.

Very heavy

conservative appearance.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki Burgman 400 vs BMW C 650 GT

There are a few key differences between a Suzuki Burgman 400 2017 and a BMW C 650 GT 2012. It takes less time to sell a Suzuki Burgman 400 with 70 days compared to 82 days for a BMW C 650 GT. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 11 reviews for the Suzuki Burgman 400 and 10 reviews for the BMW C 650 GT since model year 2012. The first review for the Suzuki Burgman 400 was published on 5/16/2010 and now has more than 22,800 views. This compares to more than 13,000 views for the first review on BMW C 650 GT published on 11/7/2011.

Price Suzuki Burgman 400

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW C 650 GT

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG