Yamaha Tracer 700 2016 vs. Yamaha Tenere 700 2020

Yamaha Tracer 700 2016

Yamaha Tracer 700 2016

Yamaha Tenere 700 2020

Yamaha Tenere 700 2020

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha Tracer 700 2016 vs Yamaha Tenere 700 2020

The Yamaha Tracer 700 model year 2016 and the Yamaha Tenere 700 model year 2020 are both motorcycles produced by Yamaha, but they have some notable differences in terms of specifications and strengths.

Starting with the technical specifications, both motorcycles have the same engine displacement of 689cc and share the same bore size of 80mm. However, the stroke length differs slightly, with the Tracer 700 having a stroke of 68.6mm and the Tenere 700 having a stroke of 65.6mm. In terms of power, the Tracer 700 has a slightly higher engine power of 75 HP compared to the Tenere 700's 73 HP. Both motorcycles have the same torque of 68 Nm and use an electric starter and chain transmission. They also have a 2-cylinder, 4-stroke engine configuration.

Moving on to the suspension, the Tracer 700 2016 model year is equipped with a telescopic fork front suspension with a travel of 130mm and a swing arm rear suspension with a travel of 130mm. On the other hand, the Tenere 700 2020 model year features an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension with a travel of 210mm and a swing arm rear suspension with a travel of 200mm. This difference in suspension travel indicates that the Tenere 700 is more suitable for off-road riding and provides better performance on rough terrains.

Yamaha Tracer 700 2016

Yamaha Tracer 700 2016

When it comes to braking, both motorcycles have double disk front brakes with a diameter of 282mm. The dimensions and weights of the tires also differ between the two models. The Tracer 700 has a front tire width of 120mm and a rear tire width of 180mm, both with a diameter of 17 inches. In contrast, the Tenere 700 has a front tire width of 90mm and a rear tire width of 150mm, with a front tire diameter of 21 inches and a rear tire diameter of 18 inches. These tire specifications suggest that the Tenere 700 is more suitable for off-road riding and provides better traction on uneven surfaces.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Tenere 700 has a longer wheelbase of 1590mm compared to the Tracer 700's 1404mm. The seat height of the Tenere 700 is also higher at 880mm, while the Tracer 700 has a seat height of 835mm. The fuel tank capacity of the Tracer 700 is slightly larger at 17 liters compared to the Tenere 700's 16 liters.

Yamaha Tenere 700 2020

Yamaha Tenere 700 2020

Analyzing the strengths of each motorcycle, the Tracer 700 2016 model year is praised for its perfectly dimensioned design, providing good wind protection and ride comfort. It is also known for being easy to handle. On the other hand, the Tenere 700 2020 model year is commended for its playful handling and great engine performance. It is also noted for its clean finish, fully adjustable chassis, low weight, and the ability to switch off the ABS. Additionally, the Tenere 700 is considered to have a fair price.

However, both motorcycles have their weaknesses. The Tracer 700 2016 model year requires relatively long legs, which may be a disadvantage for riders with shorter stature. It is also criticized for having average brakes. On the other hand, the Tenere 700 2020 model year lacks some electronics that would be useful for road trips. Additionally, the seat of the Tenere 700 could potentially become uncomfortable on long journeys.

In conclusion, while both the Yamaha Tracer 700 2016 and the Yamaha Tenere 700 2020 are sport touring motorcycles with similar engine specifications, they have distinct differences in terms of suspension, tire dimensions, dimensions and weights, and strengths and weaknesses. The Tracer 700 is more suitable for road riding with its comfortable design, while the Tenere 700 is better suited for off-road adventures with its superior suspension travel and tire specifications.

Technical Specifications Yamaha Tracer 700 2016 compared to Yamaha Tenere 700 2020

Yamaha Tracer 700 2016
Yamaha Tenere 700 2020

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke68.6 mmStroke65.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power75 HPEngine power73 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,000 rpm
TorqueTorque68 NmTorque68 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio11.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement689 ccmDisplacement689 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel130 mmTravel210 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
TravelTravel130 mmTravel200 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter282 mmDiameter282 mm
ActuationActuationHydraulicActuationHydraulic

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter245 mmDiameter245 mm

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
LengthLength2,138 mmLength2,365 mm
WidthWidth806 mmWidth915 mm
HeightHeight1,270 mmHeight1,455 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,404 mmWheelbase1,590 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height880 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha Tracer 700 2016

Yamaha Tracer 700 2016

The Yamaha Tracer 700 is clearly more mature than the other MT-07 models. It seems bigger and a little more ponderous, but also more complete and confident. It's a really good touring bike that doesn't leave you wanting for anything.

Perfectly dimensioned

good wind protection and ride comfort

easy to handle

Relatively long legs required

average brake

Yamaha Tenere 700 2020

Yamaha Tenere 700 2020

Compared to the sporty single-cylinder competition from KTM or Husqvarna, which you first have to make suitable for touring with a windshield, larger tank, etc., the Twin offers a smoother ride and thus better long-distance capability, and compared to most two-cylinder competitors, with the exception of KTM's 890 Adventure R, it offers more off-road capability. In any case, the Tenere 700 has become a real enrichment for the touring enduro segment, so it was worth the wait.

playful handling

great engine

clean finish

fully adjustable chassis

low weight

ABS can be switched off

fair price

few electronics for road trips

seat could become uncomfortable on long journeys

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha Tracer 700 vs Yamaha Tenere 700

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha Tracer 700 2016 and a Yamaha Tenere 700 2020. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha Tenere 700 with 56 days compared to 102 days for the Yamaha Tracer 700. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Yamaha Tracer 700 and 41 reviews for the Yamaha Tenere 700 since model year 2019. The first review for the Yamaha Tracer 700 was published on 4/20/2016 and now has more than 26,400 views. This compares to more than 50,600 views for the first review on Yamaha Tenere 700 published on 10/1/2018.

Price Yamaha Tracer 700

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha Tenere 700

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG