BMW R 1200 R 2015 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

BMW R 1200 R 2015

BMW R 1200 R 2015

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Loading...

Overview - BMW R 1200 R 2015 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

The BMW R 1200 R 2015 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine performance, the BMW R 1200 R 2015 is equipped with a Boxer engine that delivers 125 horsepower and 125 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 features an in-line engine that produces 131 horsepower and 105 Nm of torque. This gives the Triumph a slight advantage in terms of power.

The cooling systems of the two bikes also differ. The BMW R 1200 R 2015 relies on air cooling, while the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 utilizes liquid cooling. Liquid cooling generally provides better heat dissipation and allows for more consistent engine performance, especially in hot weather or during prolonged periods of riding.

BMW R 1200 R 2015

BMW R 1200 R 2015

In terms of suspension, the BMW R 1200 R 2015 is equipped with a telescopic fork front suspension, while the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 features an upside-down telescopic fork front suspension. The upside-down design of the Triumph's suspension provides better stability and control during aggressive riding.

The chassis of the two bikes also differ. The BMW R 1200 R 2015 has a steel frame, whereas the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 features an aluminum frame. Aluminum frames are generally lighter and offer better handling and maneuverability.

Both bikes are equipped with four-piston radial front brakes, which provide excellent stopping power and control. This is an important feature for riders who value safety and performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW R 1200 R 2015 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1515 mm compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010's 1429 mm. The seat height of the BMW is also lower at 790 mm, making it more accessible for shorter riders. However, the Triumph has a larger fuel tank capacity of 18 liters, which may be beneficial for riders who frequently take long trips.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

When it comes to strengths, the BMW R 1200 R 2015 has a sporty look, a powerful engine, and a comfortable seating position. It also comes with ABS and traction control as standard, as well as two riding modes. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 offers more power, increased torque, reduced weight, and improved geometry, making it more agile and precise.

In terms of weaknesses, the BMW R 1200 R 2015 has many cool features that are only available at an extra cost. Additionally, the rev counter on the bike may be poorly readable, which could be a disadvantage for some riders. On the other hand, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 may have space problems for riders who weigh over 100kg.

Overall, both the BMW R 1200 R 2015 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010 are impressive naked bikes with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. Riders should consider their specific preferences and priorities when choosing between the two models.

Technical Specifications BMW R 1200 R 2015 compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

BMW R 1200 R 2015
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeBoxerEngine typeIn line
BoreBore101 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke73 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power125 HPEngine power131 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpm
TorqueTorque125 NmTorque105 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,550 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
CoolingCoolingAirCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,170 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeLoad-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,165 mmLength2,115 mm
WidthWidth880 mmWidth780 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,515 mmWheelbase1,429 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18 lFuel Tank Capacity18 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW R 1200 R 2015

BMW R 1200 R 2015

The predecessor was already able to be ridden in a sporty manner as well as convincing on tours, the new R 1200 R can do even more - thanks to the pannier system (of course at extra cost), travelling is still no problem, but it masters sport even better. Thanks to the now partially water-cooled boxer twin-cylinder engine, it is wonderfully agile - 125 hp may not seem like much on paper, but the engine pushes incredibly and behaves in a cultivated manner to boot. The chassis and brakes also score highly and the seating position is sporty and upright, covering a wide spectrum from wonderful fun to long-distance touring. Unfortunately, BMW also understands the trick with the surcharge list perfectly. The basic model is well equipped with ABS that can be deactivated, traction control that can also be deactivated and two driving modes, but many interesting gimmicks are almost obligatory - and of course drive the price way up.

Sporty look

powerful engine

good sound, comfortable seating position

ABS and traction control standard

two riding modes

Many cool features only available at extra cost

poorly readable rev counter

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010

Euphoria spread through the long bends. The Triple is a bit more expensive than some Nippon Nakeds with cheap chassis and you can feel it. It remains stable, you can open the throttle hard and you hit the line exactly.

More power

increased torque

reduced weight

agility

greatly improved geometry

precise and fast.

>100kg people might have space problems.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW R 1200 R vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050

There are a few key differences between a BMW R 1200 R 2015 and a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2010. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 23. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 57 days compared to 69 days for the BMW R 1200 R. Since model year 2007 1000PS.de editors have written 27 reviews for the BMW R 1200 R and 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 since model year 2005. The first review for the BMW R 1200 R was published on 7/7/2006 and now has more than 14,900 views. This compares to more than 16,200 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple 1050 published on 10/2/2007.

Price BMW R 1200 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG