Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 vs. Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013

Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017

Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017

Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013

Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013

Loading...

Overview - Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 vs Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013

The Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 and the Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013 are both enduro motorcycles with similar engine types and displacement. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013 has a significant advantage with 137 HP compared to the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017's 95 HP. The Triumph also has a higher torque rating of 121 Nm compared to the Honda's 98 Nm. This means that the Triumph will likely have more acceleration and power on the road.

Another difference is in the transmission. The Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 has a chain transmission, while the Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013 has a prop shaft transmission. This could affect the overall performance and maintenance requirements of the motorcycles.

Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017

Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017

In terms of suspension, both models have front suspension from reputable brands (Showa for the Honda and Kayaba for the Triumph). However, the Honda has upside-down telescopic forks and offers more adjustment options for compression, preload, and rebound. The Triumph only has preload adjustment for the front suspension. This means that the Honda may offer a more customizable and comfortable riding experience, especially off-road.

Both motorcycles have double disk brakes at the front, with the same brand (Nissin). This ensures good stopping power and reliability.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 has both ABS and traction control, while the Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013 only has traction control. This means that the Honda offers an additional safety feature, which can be beneficial in various riding conditions.

Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013

Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013 has a slightly longer wheelbase (1530 mm) compared to the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 (1575 mm). The seat height is also slightly lower on the Triumph (840 mm) compared to the Honda (850 mm). However, the Triumph is significantly heavier with a kerb weight of 259 kg compared to the Honda's 232 kg. This could affect the maneuverability and handling of the motorcycles, especially off-road.

Lastly, the fuel tank capacity is slightly larger on the Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013 with 20 liters compared to the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017's 18.8 liters. This means that the Triumph may offer a slightly longer range before needing to refuel.

In conclusion, while both the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 and the Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013 are capable enduro motorcycles, they have some notable differences. The Triumph offers more power and a comfortable chassis, but is heavier. The Honda offers a more customizable suspension and additional safety features, but may have less power. Ultimately, the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 compared to Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013

Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017
Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013
Show all
Same only
Differences
Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017
Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017
Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013
Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore92 mmBore85 mm
StrokeStroke75.1 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power95 HPEngine power137 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,000 rpm
TorqueTorque98 NmTorque121 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,000 rpmRpm at Torque6,400 rpm
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionProp shaft
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement998 ccmDisplacement1,215 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
BrandBrandShowaBrandKayaba
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
BrandBrandNissinBrandNissin

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsTraction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height80 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,335 mmLength2,248 mm
WidthWidth875 mmWidth885 mm
HeightHeight1,475 mmHeight1,410 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,575 mmWheelbase1,530 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height850 mmSeat Height840 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)232 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)259 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18.8 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017

Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017

Still sensational. It scores with the familiar Honda virtues, but never gets stale. A motorbike that goes with you through thick and thin and doesn't tire even on extra-long tours. Very robust off-road, also copes with really tough passages without any problems. Still the benchmark for touring enduros in 2017.

Comfortable but not boring

Pleasant and perfectly dimensioned engine

Seat height a tad lower than on the KTM- from 175cm height it could work

Suspension elements do everything off-road, but are too comfortably tuned at high speeds

traction control is annoying off-road - always has to be readjusted after every short break.

Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013

Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013

The three-cylinder lacks a little pressure from the rev range, but it revs and shrieks out of the top like a three-headed hellhound. The XC version in particular is a real man's bike with a lot of power and mass.

Powerful and lively engine

comfortable chassis

high weight

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin vs Triumph Tiger Explorer

There are a few key differences between a Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 and a Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 is about 7% higher. Compared to Triumph Tiger Explorer 2013 there are more Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 13 compared to 9. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Tiger Explorer with 47 days compared to 91 days for the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 47 reviews for the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin and 14 reviews for the Triumph Tiger Explorer since model year 2012. The first review for the Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin was published on 5/12/2015 and now has more than 13,600 views. This compares to more than 13,600 views for the first review on Triumph Tiger Explorer published on 10/23/2011.

Price Honda CRF1000L Africa Twin

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Tiger Explorer

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen