Beta RR 300 2T 2017 vs. Husqvarna WR 250 2013

Beta RR 300 2T 2017

Beta RR 300 2T 2017

Husqvarna WR 250 2013

Husqvarna WR 250 2013

Loading...

Overview - Beta RR 300 2T 2017 vs Husqvarna WR 250 2013

Beta RR 300 2T 2017

Beta RR 300 2T 2017

Husqvarna WR 250 2013

Husqvarna WR 250 2013

Technical Specifications Beta RR 300 2T 2017 compared to Husqvarna WR 250 2013

Beta RR 300 2T 2017
Husqvarna WR 250 2013
Show all
Same only
Differences
Beta RR 300 2T 2017
Beta RR 300 2T 2017
Husqvarna WR 250 2013
Husqvarna WR 250 2013

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,465 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height930 mmSeat Height975 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight104 kgDry Weight103 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.5 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta RR 300 2T vs Husqvarna WR 250

Price Beta RR 300 2T

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna WR 250

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUIScalimoto GmbHContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthMotorex AG