Kawasaki Z 300 2016 vs. KTM 390 Duke 2016

Kawasaki Z 300 2016

Kawasaki Z 300 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z 300 2016 vs KTM 390 Duke 2016

The Kawasaki Z 300 2016 and the KTM 390 Duke 2016 are both naked bikes that offer unique features and strengths.

Starting with the Kawasaki Z 300 2016, it boasts a powerful engine with 39 HP and 27 Nm of torque. It has a 2-cylinder engine with a displacement of 296cc. The frame is made of steel, providing a sturdy and reliable structure. The front brakes have double piston technology, ensuring efficient stopping power. The front and rear tires have a width of 110mm and a diameter of 17 inches respectively. The wheelbase is 1405mm, providing stability and control. The seat height is 785mm, offering a comfortable riding position. With a kerb weight of 170kg (with ABS), it is slightly heavier than its counterpart. The fuel tank capacity is 17 liters, allowing for longer rides without frequent refueling.

The strengths of the Kawasaki Z 300 2016 include its adult look and high-quality finish, giving it a premium appearance. The high-revving engine delivers impressive performance, while the comfortable seating position enhances the overall riding experience. The stable brake system ensures reliable stopping power, and the easy-to-read and complete cockpit provides all the necessary information for the rider. Additionally, the Kawasaki Z 300 2016 has a low fuel consumption, making it an economical choice.

Kawasaki Z 300 2016

Kawasaki Z 300 2016

However, the Kawasaki Z 300 2016 does have some weaknesses. The sound of the engine is very unobtrusive, which may not appeal to riders seeking a more aggressive sound. Additionally, while the chassis components are favorable, the engine only starts when idling, which may be inconvenient for some riders.

On the other hand, the KTM 390 Duke 2016 offers a slightly more powerful engine with 44 HP and 35 Nm of torque. It has a single-cylinder engine with a displacement of 373.2cc. The frame is made of chromium-molybdenum, providing strength and durability. The front brakes have four pistons and radial technology, ensuring excellent stopping power. The front and rear tires have a width of 110mm and 150mm respectively, with a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is slightly shorter at 1367mm, offering a more compact and agile ride. The seat height is 800mm, which may be slightly higher for some riders. With a kerb weight of 139kg (with ABS), it is significantly lighter than the Kawasaki Z 300 2016. The fuel tank capacity is 11 liters, which is slightly smaller than its counterpart.

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

The strengths of the KTM 390 Duke 2016 include its low weight, which contributes to its agility and maneuverability. The sufficient power of the engine ensures a thrilling and fun riding experience. Additionally, the KTM 390 Duke 2016 has a low fuel consumption, making it an economical choice for riders.

However, the KTM 390 Duke 2016 does have some weaknesses. The clutch may feel sluggish, which can affect the overall riding experience. Additionally, the small geometry may not be suitable for taller riders, as the seat height is slightly higher compared to the Kawasaki Z 300 2016.

In conclusion, both the Kawasaki Z 300 2016 and the KTM 390 Duke 2016 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Kawasaki Z 300 2016 offers a more adult look, high-quality finish, and comfortable seating position. It has a stable brake system and easy-to-read cockpit, with the advantage of low fuel consumption. On the other hand, the KTM 390 Duke 2016 is lighter and offers sufficient power for an exciting ride. It has a low fuel consumption and a more compact geometry. Ultimately, the choice between these two models depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z 300 2016 compared to KTM 390 Duke 2016

Kawasaki Z 300 2016
KTM 390 Duke 2016
Show all
Same only
Differences
Kawasaki Z 300 2016
Kawasaki Z 300 2016
KTM 390 Duke 2016
KTM 390 Duke 2016

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameChromium-molybdenum

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,405 mmWheelbase1,367 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height800 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)170 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)139 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z 300 2016

Kawasaki Z 300 2016

The cool design of the Kawasaki Z300, which is extremely similar to that of its big sister Z800, makes it a very grown-up-looking motorbike. The stable braking system and the easy-to-read cockpit with an analogue rev counter and all the necessary features fit in very well with this image. Thanks to the 170 kg ready-to-ride weight, the bike is extremely easy to handle and playful. The engine only reveals its potential in the upper rev range, but revs up willingly and makes you want to ride in a sporty manner. Only the comfort-oriented chassis cannot quite cope with radically sporty demands - but this is quite legitimate and understandable for an entry-level motorbike.

Adult look

high-quality finish

high-revving engine

comfortable seating position

stable brake

easy-to-read, complete cockpit

low fuel consumption.

Very unobtrusive sound

favourable chassis components

engine only starts when idling

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

The KTM 390 Duke is a really good compromise between sportiness, reason, riding comfort, fun and price. Best of all: it doesn't feel like a compromise at all, but like it's ready to race.

Low weight

sufficient power

high fun factor

low consumption

Sluggish clutch

small geometry

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z 300 vs KTM 390 Duke

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z 300 2016 and a KTM 390 Duke 2016. It takes less time to sell a KTM 390 Duke with 60 days compared to 88 days for the Kawasaki Z 300. Since model year 2015 1000PS.de editors have written 5 reviews for the Kawasaki Z 300 and 33 reviews for the KTM 390 Duke since model year 2013. The first review for the Kawasaki Z 300 was published on 11/4/2014 and now has more than 59,800 views. This compares to more than 26,300 views for the first review on KTM 390 Duke published on 11/12/2012.

Price Kawasaki Z 300

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 390 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen