Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2016

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 vs Yamaha MT-09 2016

In terms of engine and drive train, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Yamaha MT-09 2016 have an in-line three-cylinder engine. However, the Speed Triple has a higher engine power of 132 HP compared to the MT-09's 115 HP. The Speed Triple also has a higher torque of 110 Nm compared to the MT-09's 87.5 Nm. Both bikes have a displacement of around 1000cc, with the Speed Triple at 1050cc and the MT-09 at 847cc.

In terms of suspension, the Speed Triple has an upside-down telescopic fork at the front, while the MT-09 has a telescopic fork. Both bikes have an aluminum frame with a twin tube design.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Speed Triple has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 190 mm, while the MT-09 has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 180 mm. Both bikes have a front tire diameter of 17 inches and a rear tire diameter of 17 inches. The Speed Triple has a wheelbase of 1437 mm, while the MT-09 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1440 mm. The seat height of the Speed Triple is 828 mm, while the MT-09 has a slightly lower seat height of 815 mm. The Speed Triple has a higher kerb weight of 219 kg compared to the MT-09's 188 kg. The Speed Triple also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters, while the MT-09 has a smaller fuel tank capacity of 14 liters.

In terms of strengths, the Speed Triple is praised for its controlled chassis, hard sound, and stability. On the other hand, the MT-09 is praised for its wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant, three power modes, fully adjustable chassis, quickshifter as standard, sporty upright seating position, good brakes, aggressive looks, and traction control.

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

In terms of weaknesses, the Speed Triple is criticized for its rough gearing, which can sometimes disturb the connection between the rider and the bike. The MT-09 is criticized for having a saddle that is a little too hard for long tours and a license plate holder on the swingarm that offers less splash protection than a conventional one.

Overall, both the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and the Yamaha MT-09 2016 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The Speed Triple offers more power and a larger fuel tank capacity, while the MT-09 offers a more advanced and versatile riding experience with its power modes, quickshifter, and traction control. The choice between the two would depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2016

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Yamaha MT-09 2016
Show all
Same only
Differences
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Yamaha MT-09 2016
Yamaha MT-09 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power132 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque110 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,500 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,086 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth728 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,120 mmHeight1,135 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,437 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height828 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight219 kgKerb Weight188 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Even a Super Duke is in a tight spot when the bends are not too sharp and the KTM can make full use of its radical handling and its unrivalled ability to correct the radius on naked bikes. The Speed Triple is more harmonious, patient and predictable. The Duke has to be beaten, the Triple can also be stroked.

Controlled chassis

hard sound

stable.

Rough gearing sometimes disturbs the idyll between man and machine.

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

The Yamaha MT-09 did not need to be reinvented for the coming season - it already was extremely well done almost four years ago. Instead, the Japanese focus on fine-tuning and adding practical, contemporary gimmicks such as traction control and automatic shifting. Due to the Euro4 standard, however, the engine management has been changed once again and offers an emphatically powerful but well controllable power delivery in standard mode; the power explosion of the first generation is now no longer offered even by the sharper A mode. The biggest change, recognisable at first glance, is the, in my opinion, extremely successful design with the more aggressive front and the newly designed rear. All in all, an even snazzier naked bike that was clearly built for the fun of motorcycling.

Wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant

three power modes

fully adjustable chassis

quickshifter as standard

sporty upright seating position

good brakes

aggressive looks

traction control.

Saddle a little too hard for long tours

licence plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection than a conventional one

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050 vs Yamaha MT-09

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 and a Yamaha MT-09 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Yamaha MT-09 2016 is about 17% higher. A Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 experiences a loss of 710 USD in one year and 820 USD in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 420 USD and 720 USD for a Yamaha MT-09 2016. Compared to Yamaha MT-09 2016 there are less Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 6 compared to 11. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 with 77 days compared to 87 days for a Yamaha MT-09. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 was published on 10/2/2007 and now has more than 16,200 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 6/10/2013.

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen