Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017 vs. BMW S 1000 RR 2017

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

BMW S 1000 RR 2017

BMW S 1000 RR 2017

Loading...

Overview - Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017 vs BMW S 1000 RR 2017

The Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017 and the BMW S 1000 RR 2017 are both powerful and high-performance supersport motorcycles. However, they have some key differences in terms of specifications and strengths.

Starting with the technical specifications, both motorcycles have an in-line four-cylinder engine with a displacement of 999cc. The Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade has a bore of 76mm and a stroke of 55mm, while the BMW S 1000 RR has a slightly larger bore of 80mm and a shorter stroke of 49.7mm. In terms of power, the BMW S 1000 RR has a slight advantage with 199 HP compared to the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade's 192 HP. However, the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade has a higher torque of 114 Nm compared to the BMW S 1000 RR's 113 Nm. Both motorcycles have a compression ratio of 13 and feature four valves per cylinder.

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

In terms of suspension, both motorcycles have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension at the rear. The chassis of both motorcycles is made of aluminum and features a twin tube frame design. The braking system on the front of both motorcycles consists of double discs, but the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade has a radial, monoblock technology, while the BMW S 1000 RR has radial technology.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade has a front tire width of 120mm and a rear tire width of 190mm, with both tires having a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase of the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade is 1405mm, and it has a seat height of 832mm. The kerb weight of the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade, including ABS, is 196kg, and it has a fuel tank capacity of 16 liters. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 RR has the same tire dimensions and wheelbase as the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade, but it has a slightly lower seat height of 815mm. The kerb weight of the BMW S 1000 RR, including ABS, is slightly higher at 208kg, and it has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters.

Now moving on to the strengths and weaknesses of each motorcycle, the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade has good brakes, a low weight, and nimble handling. Its engine provides plenty of power throughout the rev range, and it has high build quality. However, it lacks a shift assistant, and the throttle grip can feel sluggish and imprecise. The chassis is considered "nice" on the racetrack but not exceptional for precise handling. Additionally, it may have some disadvantages in terms of peak performance on long straights.

BMW S 1000 RR 2017

BMW S 1000 RR 2017

On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 RR comes with complete electronic equipment and high-quality features. Its engine is strong, powerful, and easy to control. The seating position is comfortable, even for taller riders. It has a good chassis for both road riding and track days. However, it may experience brake fade on the racetrack under high load. The ride quality is sufficient for track days but not up to par for racing. Additionally, some riders may find its appearance to be somewhat dull, despite being technologically up to date.

In conclusion, both the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017 and the BMW S 1000 RR 2017 are impressive supersport motorcycles with their own set of strengths and weaknesses. The Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade offers good brakes, low weight, and nimble handling, while the BMW S 1000 RR provides complete electronic equipment, a strong engine, and a comfortable seating position. Riders should consider their priorities and preferences to choose the motorcycle that best suits their needs.

Technical Specifications Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017 compared to BMW S 1000 RR 2017

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017
BMW S 1000 RR 2017
Show all
Same only
Differences
Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017
Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017
BMW S 1000 RR 2017
BMW S 1000 RR 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore76 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke55 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power192 HPEngine power199 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,500 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque113 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque11,000 rpmRpm at Torque10,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13 Compression Ratio13
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradial, MonoblockTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,065 mmLength2,050 mm
WidthWidth720 mmWidth826 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,405 mmWheelbase1,438 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height832 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)196 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)208 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017

A worthy new edition from Honda. Even if it doesn't quite shine as brightly in the standard version as it does with the Öhlins Gold in the "SP" version, the Fireblade is a much better bike in 2017. The electronics package is good, the handling great and the seating position very good. The bike looks like a unified whole and will make Honda fans happy.

Good brakes

Low weight and nimble handling

Engine has plenty of power from the rev range

High build quality

No shift assistant

sluggish and not very precise throttle grip

chassis "nice" on the racetrack but not good enough to precisely set the scene for the great handling

disadvantages at peak performance on long straights

BMW S 1000 RR 2017

BMW S 1000 RR 2017

The well-balanced universal talent will also be at the forefront of many comparison tests in 2017. It still scores with the outstanding engine and the universal and complete equipment.

On request with complete electronic equipment. All features available in high quality

Strong engine - powerful and easy to control

Comfortable seating position even for taller riders

Good chassis on the road and at trackdays

Brake fade on the racetrack under high load

Ride quality high enough for trackdays but not good enough for racing

Looks greyed out even though it is technically up to date

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade vs BMW S 1000 RR

There are a few key differences between a Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017 and a BMW S 1000 RR 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 RR 2017 is about 28% higher. Compared to BMW S 1000 RR 2017 there are less Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 4 compared to 9. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 RR with 96 days compared to 112 days for the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade. Since model year 2005 1000PS.de editors have written 71 reviews for the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade and 135 reviews for the BMW S 1000 RR since model year 2010. The first review for the Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade was published on 11/25/2003 and now has more than 3,700 views. This compares to more than 4,000 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 RR published on 4/16/2008.

Price Honda CBR1000RR Fireblade

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen