Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017 vs. Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017

Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017 vs Yamaha XSR900 2016

The Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017 offers several notable improvements compared to the Yamaha XSR900 2016. Firstly, the Abarth model boasts a magnificent design that sets it apart from other naked bikes. Its exclusive styling is sure to turn heads on the road. Additionally, the XSR900 Abarth is equipped with a strong three-cylinder engine that delivers 115 horsepower, providing an exhilarating riding experience. The torque remains the same at 87.5 Nm.

Both models feature an in-line engine configuration with liquid cooling and a displacement of 847cc. The suspension setup, consisting of an upside-down telescopic fork in the front and a swing arm with a monoshock in the rear, remains unchanged. The chassis is also the same, featuring an aluminum frame with a twin-tube design.

In terms of braking performance, both bikes come with double disk brakes in the front, but the XSR900 Abarth has an advantage with a larger diameter of 298mm. This ensures powerful and reliable stopping power. The 2016 XSR900 also has double disk brakes, but the diameter is not specified. Both models are equipped with ABS as standard, providing advanced rider assistance and enhancing safety.

Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017

Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017

In terms of dimensions and weights, the XSR900 Abarth and the 2016 XSR900 share the same front and rear tire widths and diameters, as well as the wheelbase. However, the seat height is slightly higher on the XSR900 Abarth at 830mm compared to 815mm on the 2016 model. The kerb weight of the XSR900 Abarth is slightly higher as well, weighing in at 195kg with ABS compared to 191kg on the 2016 model. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 14 liters.

Moving on to the strengths of the XSR900 Abarth, its most notable feature is its exclusivity. The Abarth model offers the highest level of exclusivity, making it a desirable choice for motorcycle enthusiasts. The bike's powerful three-cylinder engine and agile handling contribute to a thrilling riding experience. Additionally, the XSR900 Abarth comes with traction control as standard, providing enhanced safety and control on various road conditions.

On the other hand, the strengths of the 2016 XSR900 include its greedy engine, well-tuned riding modes, and the inclusion of ABS and TC as standard. The bike also features an authentic modern design and clean workmanship.

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

However, the XSR900 Abarth does have a few weaknesses. The handlebar is positioned very low, which may not be comfortable for all riders. Additionally, the Abarth model comes with a higher price tag compared to the 2016 XSR900.

The weaknesses of the 2016 XSR900 include a hard chassis, which may result in a less comfortable ride, and the seat could be more comfortable for longer journeys. Furthermore, the speedblock design on the 2016 model has already been seen on many other Yamaha models, which may not appeal to riders looking for a more unique aesthetic.

Overall, the Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017 offers several improvements over the 2016 XSR900, including a more exclusive design, traction control as standard, and powerful brakes. However, it does come at a higher price and may not be suitable for riders who prioritize comfort.

Technical Specifications Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017 compared to Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017
Yamaha XSR900 2016
Show all
Same only
Differences
Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017
Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017
Yamaha XSR900 2016
Yamaha XSR900 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio11.5
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionTransistorIgnitionTransistor
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel137 mmTravel137 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel130 mmTravel130 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail103 mmTrail103 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter298 mmDiameter298 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter245 mmDiameter245 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth815 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,135 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)195 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)191 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017

Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017

Basically, it hardly matters whether I think the Yamaha XSR900 Abarth is good or bad - the first 95 of the 695 units worldwide were sold out within 20 minutes. So there's no need to worry about the remaining 600. Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that the Abarth version looks enormously good with the carbon fairings front and rear, the Akrapovic exhaust and the suede saddle. The low handlebars are not as comfortable as the conventional XSR900, but fit perfectly with this stylish appearance. The engine, chassis and brakes work just like on the normal XSR900 - in other words, extremely sporty and wonderfully rideable.

magnificent design

highest exclusivity

strong three-cylinder engine

powerful brakes

agile handling

traction control standard

Very low positioned handlebar

high price

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

The XSR900 combines the performance of a sporty streetfighter with the look of a pleasing, cleanly finished retro naked bike. In doing so, the Japanese make use of their own history, which can be found bundled and without gaps in the archive of the design agency that has been working for Yamaha for 60 years. It adopts the virtues of the MT-09 and has mended some of its weaknesses. It rides more harmoniously, more controlled and, if desired, more relaxed. Only the comfort, and thus the rider, suffers from the tight chassis on bad roads. You have to be a little bit sensitive when it comes to a neo-classic.

Greedy engine

well-tuned riding modes

ABS and TC as standard

authentic modern design

clean workmanship

hard chassis

seat should be more comfortable

speedblock design already on many other models

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha XSR900 Abarth vs Yamaha XSR900

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha XSR900 Abarth 2017 and a Yamaha XSR900 2016. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XSR900 with 77 days compared to 189 days for the Yamaha XSR900 Abarth. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 3 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 Abarth and 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 since model year 2016. The first review for the Yamaha XSR900 Abarth was published on 11/7/2016 and now has more than 24,100 views. This compares to more than 17,600 views for the first review on Yamaha XSR900 published on 11/25/2015.

Price Yamaha XSR900 Abarth

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen