Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 vs. BMW K 1200 R 2005

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

BMW K 1200 R 2005

BMW K 1200 R 2005

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 vs BMW K 1200 R 2005

In comparing the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 and the BMW K 1200 R 2005, several factors come into play. Starting with the technical specifications, the Speed Triple S has a slightly lower engine power of 140 HP compared to the K 1200 R's 160 HP. However, the Speed Triple S compensates for this with its distinctive three-cylinder engine, which provides a unique and recognizable sound. On the other hand, the K 1200 R boasts a four-cylinder engine, which may not have the same distinctiveness but offers a higher power output.

Both bikes feature liquid cooling systems, ensuring efficient temperature regulation for optimal performance. In terms of engine displacement, the Speed Triple S has a capacity of 1050 ccm, while the K 1200 R has a larger 1157 ccm displacement. This suggests that the K 1200 R may have a slight advantage in terms of torque and overall power delivery.

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

Moving on to dimensions and weights, the Speed Triple S has a shorter wheelbase of 1435 mm compared to the K 1200 R's 1571 mm. This shorter wheelbase may contribute to the Speed Triple S's sporty and agile handling characteristics. Additionally, the Speed Triple S has a fuel tank capacity of 15.5 liters, slightly smaller than the K 1200 R's 17 liters. This means that the K 1200 R may have a slightly longer range before needing to refuel.

Considering the strengths of each bike, the Speed Triple S stands out with its distinctive look and sporty seating position. The bike's well-functioning electronics package enhances the riding experience, providing additional safety and convenience features. On the other hand, the K 1200 R is praised for its easy start and positive chassis concept, ensuring a smooth and comfortable ride even at high speeds. The bike's optimal braking system, including ABS, adds an extra layer of safety.

BMW K 1200 R 2005

BMW K 1200 R 2005

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Speed Triple S could benefit from a more responsive engine at the bottom end, as it may feel slightly sluggish in certain situations. Additionally, its handling may not be as nimble as some riders would prefer. In contrast, the K 1200 R may require some effort in fast turns, potentially affecting its overall maneuverability.

In conclusion, the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 and the BMW K 1200 R 2005 offer distinct characteristics and strengths. The Speed Triple S stands out with its unique three-cylinder engine and distinctive look, while the K 1200 R impresses with its higher engine power and smooth handling. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes will depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 compared to BMW K 1200 R 2005

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
BMW K 1200 R 2005
Show all
Same only
Differences
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
BMW K 1200 R 2005
BMW K 1200 R 2005

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

The Speed Triple remains true to its line in the latest generation - a wonderfully sharp naked bike that characterises the streetfighter style like hardly any other model. It only makes limited sense for the racetrack - of course, the roaring three-cylinder engine with 140 hp is enormous fun and the Fafhrwerk shows no gross weaknesses, but there is a Speed Triple R with Öhlins suspension elements that naturally feels more at home on the racetrack. All in all, the Speed Triple S is an excellent country road fighter that also has a lot to offer in terms of looks.

Three-cylinder engine with distinctive sound

distinctive look

good brakes

sporty seating position

well-functioning electronics package.

Engine could be more responsive at the bottom end

somewhat sluggish handling

BMW K 1200 R 2005

BMW K 1200 R 2005

A lot of motorbike power under the BMW logo still causes amazement even among 4-wheeled road users.

Easy start

positive chassis concept

smooth handling - even at high speed

optimal braking system incl. ABS

Some effort required in fast turns

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple S vs BMW K 1200 R

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 and a BMW K 1200 R 2005. It takes less time to sell a BMW K 1200 R with 60 days compared to 93 days for the Triumph Speed Triple S. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 6 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple S and 7 reviews for the BMW K 1200 R since model year 2005. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple S was published on 10/23/2011 and now has more than 10,300 views. This compares to more than 1,700 views for the first review on BMW K 1200 R published on 10/24/2004.

Price Triumph Speed Triple S

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW K 1200 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUIScalimoto GmbHContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthMotorex AG