Ducati Monster 696 2008 vs. Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Ducati Monster 696 2008

Ducati Monster 696 2008

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Loading...

Overview - Ducati Monster 696 2008 vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

The Ducati Monster 696 2008 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 are both popular naked bikes in their respective model years. While they share some similarities, they also have distinct differences that set them apart.

In terms of engine power, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 takes the lead with 106 HP compared to the Ducati Monster 696 2008's 80 HP. This higher power output gives the Triumph an advantage in terms of acceleration and overall performance.

The engine configuration also differs between the two bikes. The Ducati Monster 696 2008 has a twin-cylinder engine, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 boasts a three-cylinder engine. The additional cylinder in the Triumph provides smoother power delivery and a unique engine sound.

Cooling systems also vary, with the Ducati Monster 696 2008 utilizing an oil-air cooling system, while the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 employs liquid cooling. Liquid cooling is generally considered more efficient and effective in maintaining optimal engine temperature.

Ducati Monster 696 2008

Ducati Monster 696 2008

In terms of displacement, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 has a larger engine at 675cc compared to the Ducati Monster 696 2008's 696cc. While the difference may seem minimal, it can affect the overall performance and torque output of the bikes.

When it comes to dimensions and weights, the Ducati Monster 696 2008 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1452mm, compared to the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012's 1410mm. The seat height is also lower on the Ducati at 770mm, while the Triumph sits slightly higher at 805mm. These differences can impact the handling and ergonomics of the bikes, with the lower seat height of the Ducati potentially offering a more comfortable riding position for shorter riders.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 has a larger tank at 17.4 liters, compared to the Ducati Monster 696 2008's 15 liters. This can result in longer intervals between refueling for the Triumph.

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Moving on to strengths, the Ducati Monster 696 2008 is praised for its comfort, providing a great ride experience. The brakes on the Ducati are also highly regarded for their performance and stopping power.

On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 is praised for its lighter weight, which contributes to improved performance and maneuverability. The bike's light-footed handling makes it extremely practical in curves, and the upright seating position adds to the overall comfort and control.

In terms of weaknesses, the Ducati Monster 696 2008 is criticized for its less sophisticated design and a relatively complicated chassis, which may not be suitable for beginners. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 lacks included ABS, although it can be purchased separately at an additional cost.

Overall, both the Ducati Monster 696 2008 and the Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012 have their unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the rider's preferences and priorities, whether it be power, handling, comfort, or design.

Technical Specifications Ducati Monster 696 2008 compared to Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Ducati Monster 696 2008
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012
Show all
Same only
Differences
Ducati Monster 696 2008
Ducati Monster 696 2008
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012
Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Ducati Monster 696 2008

Ducati Monster 696 2008

It will be interesting to see how the new design is received by the old fans and whether it will reach enough new fans. In any case, the smallest Monster has taken a big step forward in terms of performance.

Comfort

great ride

brakes.

Design not too sophisticated

chassis relatively complicated - not for beginners.

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012

All it takes is the slightest impulse and the little Englishwoman turns exactly the way you want it to. This manoeuvrability is also unparalleled in the class of medium-sized naked bikes. A motorbike that can be moved in such a sporty manner would not deserve to be abused as a mile-eater and travel steamer.

Less weight

improved performance

light-footed handling

extremely practical in curves

sitting upright.

Unincluded ABS - but not really expensive to buy.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Ducati Monster 696 vs Triumph Street Triple 675 R

There are a few key differences between a Ducati Monster 696 2008 and a Triumph Street Triple 675 R 2012. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 7. It takes less time to sell a Ducati Monster 696 with 56 days compared to 73 days for a Triumph Street Triple 675 R. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 9 reviews for the Ducati Monster 696 and 16 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple 675 R since model year 2009. The first review for the Ducati Monster 696 was published on 11/8/2007 and now has more than 7,300 views. This compares to more than 13,000 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple 675 R published on 7/20/2008.

Price Ducati Monster 696

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple 675 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen