Husqvarna TE 300 2016 vs. Husqvarna FE 450 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna FE 450 2015

Husqvarna FE 450 2015

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 300 2016 vs Husqvarna FE 450 2015

The Husqvarna TE 300 2016 and the Husqvarna FE 450 2015 are both enduro motorcycles with similar technical specifications. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine and drive train, the TE 300 has a smaller bore and stroke of 72 mm, while the FE 450 has a larger bore of 95 mm and a shorter stroke of 63.4 mm. The TE 300 has an electric and kick starter, while the FE 450 only has a kick starter. Both models have a chain transmission and a single cylinder engine, but the TE 300 has a displacement of 293.2 ccm, while the FE 450 has a displacement of 449.3 ccm.

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Both the TE 300 and the FE 450 have upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension, with the same brand, WP. The rear suspension also has the same brand, WP, for both models. The chassis for both models is made of steel and has a central tube frame type.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both models have a 21-inch front tire diameter and a 140 mm rear tire width. The TE 300 has an 18-inch rear tire diameter, while the FE 450 has a 18-inch rear tire diameter. Both models have a wheelbase of 1482 mm, but the TE 300 has a slightly lower seat height of 960 mm compared to the FE 450's seat height of 970 mm. The TE 300 also has a slightly lighter dry weight of 104.6 kg, while the FE 450 has a dry weight of 113 kg. The TE 300 has a larger fuel tank capacity of 11 l, while the FE 450 has a smaller fuel tank capacity of 9 l.

In terms of strengths, the TE 300 is much quieter due to a balancer shaft, has a powerful engine, and offers a good balance of weight and performance. On the other hand, the FE 450 has lots of power but is still easy to drive, has superior handling in almost every situation, and is stable but manageable enough. The FE 450 also has a high build quality and a mature concept that has been proven thousands of times over.

Husqvarna FE 450 2015

Husqvarna FE 450 2015

In terms of weaknesses, the TE 300 is not ideal for smooth and easy tracks, as the rider may prefer a four-stroke engine in those conditions. The FE 450, on the other hand, may be slower than a 350 or a two-stroke on a special stage, and the extra weight compared to the 350s can be noticeable after a crash when picking the bike up.

Overall, the TE 300 and the FE 450 have their own strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between the two models will depend on the rider's preferences and the specific riding conditions.

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 300 2016 compared to Husqvarna FE 450 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2016
Husqvarna FE 450 2015
Show all
Same only
Differences
Husqvarna TE 300 2016
Husqvarna TE 300 2016
Husqvarna FE 450 2015
Husqvarna FE 450 2015

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeCentral tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height960 mmSeat Height970 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight104.6 kgDry Weight113 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity9 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Husqvarna TE 300 2016

Completely new engine for 2017! Lighter and quieter thanks to the balancer shaft, the two-stroke has also been lightened, with the 300 now weighing in at 102 kg. The choice for Erzberg, Romaniacs and Co!

Much quieter due to balancer shaft

powerful engine

best balance of weight and performance

I would prefer a four-stroke on smooth and easy tracks

Husqvarna FE 450 2015

Husqvarna FE 450 2015

Still the golden mean. Much easier to ride than a 350. Not quite as nervous, but just a tad more ponderous. It has no end of power and torque. The 501 is frankly superfluous. This bike is not too weak for anyone. Probably not the coolest choice, 450 was "mainstream" for years, but in the course of a hard enduro week the best partner you could wish for. The few extra kilos are quickly forgotten on the leisurely connecting stages. During the test we also rode it with a Rekluse automatic clutch. This worked great and saved power.

lots of power but still easy to drive

superior handling in almost every situation

not nervous, not tippy, stable but manageable enough

high build quality

mature concept, proven thousands of times over

Slower than a 350 or a two-stroke on the special stage

After the crash you are reminded of the extra pounds compared to 350s - if you have to pick them up

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 300 vs Husqvarna FE 450

There are a few key differences between a Husqvarna TE 300 2016 and a Husqvarna FE 450 2015. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna TE 300 with 76 days compared to 97 days for a Husqvarna FE 450. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 6 reviews for the Husqvarna TE 300 and 7 reviews for the Husqvarna FE 450 since model year 2014. The first review for the Husqvarna TE 300 was published on 11/3/2013 and now has more than 6,800 views. This compares to more than 21,800 views for the first review on Husqvarna FE 450 published on 10/16/2013.

Price Husqvarna TE 300

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna FE 450

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUIScalimoto GmbHContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthMotorex AG