Kawasaki Z900 2020 vs. Triumph Street Triple S 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Triumph Street Triple S 2018

Triumph Street Triple S 2018

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2020 vs Triumph Street Triple S 2018

When comparing the Kawasaki Z900 2020 and the Triumph Street Triple S 2018, several factors come into play. Starting with the technical specifications, both bikes have an inline engine type and liquid cooling system. However, the Z900 boasts a higher engine power of 125.4 HP compared to the Street Triple S's 113 HP. The Z900 also offers more torque at 98.6 Nm, while the Street Triple S has 73 Nm. In terms of displacement, the Z900 has a larger engine at 948 ccm, while the Street Triple S has a slightly smaller engine at 765 ccm.

Moving on to the suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks in the front and a swing arm with a monoshock in the rear. However, the Z900 offers additional adjustment options for the rear suspension, including preload and rebound, while the Street Triple S only has preload adjustment. The Z900 also has an aluminum shock absorber, which may provide better performance compared to the Street Triple S's standard shock absorber.

In terms of brakes, both bikes have double disk brakes in the front. However, the Z900 has larger brake discs with a diameter of 300 mm compared to the Street Triple S's 310 mm. The Z900 also has four-piston calipers in the front, while the Street Triple S has double-piston calipers.

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Both bikes come equipped with advanced rider assistance systems, including ABS, riding modes, ride by wire, and traction control. This ensures a safer and more controlled riding experience for the rider.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. However, the Z900 has a longer wheelbase at 1450 mm compared to the Street Triple S's 1410 mm. The seat height of the Z900 is also slightly lower at 795 mm compared to the Street Triple S's 810 mm.

Triumph Street Triple S 2018

Triumph Street Triple S 2018

Now, let's consider the strengths of each bike. The Kawasaki Z900 2020 is praised for its powerful four-cylinder engine, great handling, good equipment, aggressive looks, and value for money. On the other hand, the Triumph Street Triple S 2018 is known for its great handling, brilliant sound, beautiful looks, comfortable seat, big tank, and two riding modes.

However, both bikes have their weaknesses as well. The Z900's menu navigation can be somewhat tiring, and it lacks the option for a quickshifter. The Street Triple S's chassis and technical equipment leave room for improvement.

In conclusion, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 and the Triumph Street Triple S 2018 are both impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Z900 offers more power and additional suspension adjustment options, while the Street Triple S has its own unique features such as a brilliant sound and beautiful looks. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2020 compared to Triumph Street Triple S 2018

Kawasaki Z900 2020
Triumph Street Triple S 2018
Show all
Same only
Differences
Kawasaki Z900 2020
Kawasaki Z900 2020
Triumph Street Triple S 2018
Triumph Street Triple S 2018

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke53.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power113 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,250 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque73 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque9,100 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12.65
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement765 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel110 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel140 mmTravel124 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake65.2 degree
TrailTrail105 mmTrail104.3 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter220 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,065 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,060 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height810 mm
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

In terms of price-performance, the Kawasaki Z900 is hard to beat at the moment. With the perfectly tuned engine, the high-quality chassis components and the electronics added for 2020, this naked bike offers everything that sporty riders will be looking for. There is really nothing to complain about, even if the option of a quickshifter would have been a nice extra. Apart from that: great shot, Kawasaki!

powerful four-cylinder

great handling

good equipment

aggressive looks

value for money

Menu navigation somewhat tiring

missing quickshifter option

Triumph Street Triple S 2018

Triumph Street Triple S 2018

Clean responsiveness, great sound and a driving position - the Street Triple S offers a comfortable yet sporty riding experience. The naked bike rides with exceptional precision and agility and offers a lot of comfort, even on longer rides, where you can also enjoy the large 17.4-litre fuel tank. The electronic throttle control ensures precise response and makes it possible to set different riding modes. We also found the comparatively low vibrations for a triple and the pleasant geometry of the vehicle positive. Compared to the other bikes in the test and its two siblings, the R and RS, the chassis is a little lax - but the ingenious, husky roaring three-cylinder sound was convincing and definitely made our hearts beat faster!

Great handling

Brilliant sound

Beautiful looks

Comfortable seat

Big tank

2 riding modes

Chassis and technical equipment leave room for improvement

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs Triumph Street Triple S

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2020 and a Triumph Street Triple S 2018. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 34. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Street Triple S with 82 days compared to 124 days for the Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 3 reviews for the Triumph Street Triple S since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 58,400 views for the first review on Triumph Street Triple S published on 1/10/2017.

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple S

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen